» Articles » PMID: 33039997

Comparing Patients' and Other Stakeholders' Preferences for Outcomes of Integrated Care for Multimorbidity: a Discrete Choice Experiment in Eight European Countries

Abstract

Objectives: To measure relative preferences for outcomes of integrated care of patients with multimorbidity from eight European countries and compare them to the preferences of other stakeholders within these countries.

Design: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in each country, asking respondents to choose between two integrated care programmes for persons with multimorbidity.

Setting: Preference data collected in Austria (AT), Croatia (HR), Germany (DE), Hungary (HU), the Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO), Spain (ES), and UK.

Participants: Patients with multimorbidity, partners and other informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policymakers.

Main Outcome Measures: Preferences of participants regarding outcomes of integrated care described as health/well-being, experience with care and cost outcomes, that is, physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and total costs. Each outcome had three levels of performance.

Results: 5122 respondents completed the DCE. In all countries, patients with multimorbidity, as well as most other stakeholder groups, assigned the (second) highest preference to enjoyment of life. The patients top-three most frequently included physical functioning, psychological well-being and continuity of care. Continuity of care also entered the top-three of professionals, payers and policymakers in four countries (AT, DE, HR and HU). Of the five stakeholder groups, preferences of professionals differed most often from preferences of patients. Professionals assigned lower weights to physical functioning in AT, DE, ES, NL and NO and higher weights to person-centredness in AT, DE, ES and HU. Payers and policymakers assigned higher weights than patients to costs, but these weights were relatively low.

Conclusion: The well-being outcome enjoyment of life is the most important outcome of integrated care in multimorbidity. This calls for a greater involvement of social and mental care providers. The difference in opinion between patients and professionals calls for shared decision-making, whereby efforts to improve well-being and person-centredness should not divert attention from improving physical functioning.

Citing Articles

Integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders: discrete choice experiment.

Massou E, Basher M, Bennett S, Ford T, Gandhi S, Heyman I BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):11.

PMID: 39754205 PMC: 11697723. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12157-8.


Medically assisted integrated rehabilitation program for people with opioid dependence: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multi-criteria decision analysis.

Islam M, Fadnes L, Johansson K, Ruths S, Rutten-van Molken M, Askildsen J BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):941.

PMID: 39716137 PMC: 11667878. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06416-5.


Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England.

Gongora-Salazar P, Perera R, Rivero-Arias O, Tsiachristas A Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(10):1145-1159.

PMID: 39085565 PMC: 11405465. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01416-5.


Maximum Acceptable Risk Estimation Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment and a Probabilistic Threshold Technique.

Veldwijk J, DiSantostefano R, Janssen E, Simons G, Englbrecht M, Bywall K Patient. 2023; 16(6):641-653.

PMID: 37647010 PMC: 10570171. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00643-w.


Comparing Patient and Provider Priorities Around Amputation Level Outcomes Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.

Poehler D, Czerniecki J, Norvell D, Henderson A, Dolan J, Devine B Ann Vasc Surg. 2023; 95:169-177.

PMID: 37263414 PMC: 10782550. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.026.


References
1.
Lancsar E, Fiebig D, Hole A . Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017; 35(7):697-716. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4. View

2.
Huber M, Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad A, Kromhout D . How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. View

3.
Mulhern B, Norman R, De Abreu Lourenco R, Malley J, Street D, Viney R . Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 233:28-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.032. View

4.
Rijken M, Hujala A, van Ginneken E, Melchiorre M, Groenewegen P, Schellevis F . Managing multimorbidity: Profiles of integrated care approaches targeting people with multiple chronic conditions in Europe. Health Policy. 2017; 122(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.002. View

5.
Leijten F, Hoedemakers M, Struckmann V, Kraus M, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Zemplenyi A . Defining good health and care from the perspective of persons with multimorbidity: results from a qualitative study of focus groups in eight European countries. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(8):e021072. PMC: 6119413. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021072. View