» Articles » PMID: 30565338

Attribute Level Overlap (and Color Coding) Can Reduce Task Complexity, Improve Choice Consistency, and Decrease the Dropout Rate in Discrete Choice Experiments

Overview
Journal Health Econ
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Dec 20
PMID 30565338
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A randomized controlled discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 3,320 participating respondents was used to investigate the individual and combined impact of level overlap and color coding on task complexity, choice consistency, survey satisfaction scores, and dropout rates. The systematic differences between the study arms allowed for a direct comparison of dropout rates and cognitive debriefing scores and accommodated the quantitative comparison of respondents' choice consistency using a heteroskedastic mixed logit model. Our results indicate that the introduction of level overlap made it significantly easier for respondents to identify the differences and choose between the choice options. As a stand-alone design strategy, attribute level overlap reduced the dropout rate by 30%, increased the level of choice consistency by 30%, and avoided learning effects in the initial choice tasks of the DCE. The combination of level overlap and color coding was even more effective: It reduced the dropout rate by 40% to 50% and increased the level of choice consistency by more than 60%. Hence, we can recommend attribute level overlap, with color coding to amplify its impact, as a standard design strategy in DCEs.

Citing Articles

How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5L.

Jiang P, Street D, Norman R, Viney R, Oppe M, Mulhern B Patient. 2025; .

PMID: 40088394 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9.


Developing a utility value set for the Gambling Quality of Life Scale-Brief (GQoLS-Brief) using a discrete choice experiment.

Luquiens A, Panjo H, Bonnaire C, Pelletier-Fleury N Qual Life Res. 2024; 34(2):457-469.

PMID: 39592497 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03835-5.


Preferences for Tapering Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Chan S, Stamp L, Treharne G, Cheung J, Dalbeth N, Grainger R Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024; 77(3):349-358.

PMID: 39308004 PMC: 11848995. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25437.


The impact of demographic change on value set validity and obsolescence.

Jonker M Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(11):3155-3160.

PMID: 39269579 PMC: 11541319. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03770-5.


Patients' Preferences for Bone-Anchored Prostheses After Lower-Extremity Amputation: A 2-Center Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands (PREFER-BAP-1).

Saleib G, Jonker M, Van Vledder M, Verhofstad M, Paping M, Leijendekkers R J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024; 106(21):2017-2027.

PMID: 39241087 PMC: 11548816. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00204.


References
1.
Gonzalez J, Reed Johnson F, Runken M, Poulos C . Evaluating migraineurs' preferences for migraine treatment outcomes using a choice experiment. Headache. 2013; 53(10):1635-50. DOI: 10.1111/head.12142. View

2.
Norman R, Viney R, Aaronson N, Brazier J, Cella D, Costa D . Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format. Qual Life Res. 2015; 25(3):637-49. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3. View

3.
Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Muhlbacher A, Regier D . Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013; 16(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223. View

4.
Hauber A, Mohamed A, Beam C, Medjedovic J, Mauskopf J . Patient preferences and assessment of likely adherence to hepatitis C virus treatment. J Viral Hepat. 2010; 18(9):619-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01343.x. View

5.
Watson V, Becker F, De Bekker-Grob E . Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2016; 26(6):810-817. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3354. View