» Articles » PMID: 33036275

DNA Repair Expression Profiling to Identify High-Risk Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Define New Therapeutic Targets

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Oct 10
PMID 33036275
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemias (CN-AML) represent about 50% of total adult AML. Despite the well-known prognosis role of gene mutations such as mutations of internal tandem duplication (-ITD), clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous in this subset of AML. Given the role of genomic instability in leukemogenesis, expression analysis of DNA repair genes might be relevant to sharpen prognosis evaluation in CN-AML. A publicly available gene expression profile dataset from two independent cohorts of patients with CN-AML were analyzed (GSE12417). We investigated the prognostic value of 175 genes involved in DNA repair. Among these genes, 23 were associated with a prognostic value. The prognostic information provided by these genes was summed in a DNA repair score, allowing to define a group of patients ( = 87; 53.7%) with poor median overall survival (OS) of 233 days (95% CI: 184-260). These results were confirmed in two validation cohorts. In multivariate Cox analysis, the DNA repair score, and -ITD mutational status remained independent prognosis factors in CN-AML. Combining these parameters allowed the identification of three risk groups with different clinical outcomes in both training and validation cohorts. Combined with and mutational status, our GE-based DNA repair score might be used as a biomarker to predict outcomes for patients with CN-AML. DNA repair score has the potential to identify CN-AML patients whose tumor cells are dependent on specific DNA repair pathways to design new therapeutic avenues.

Citing Articles

RAD51 and RAD50 genetic polymorphisms from homologous recombination repair pathway are associated with disease outcomes and organ toxicities in AML.

Mohseni A, Toogeh G, Rostami S, Faranoush M, Sharifi M Blood Res. 2024; 59(1):46.

PMID: 39738991 PMC: 11685162. DOI: 10.1007/s44313-024-00033-7.


APEX1 Polymorphisms Affect Acute Myeloid Leukemia Risk, and Its Expression Is Involved in Cell Proliferation and Differentiation.

Gotoh N, Oda T, Kitamura Y, Shiraishi N, Aoyagi R, Omori A Int J Lab Hematol. 2024; 47(2):276-287.

PMID: 39536468 PMC: 11885693. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.14401.


DNA damage accumulation and repair defects in FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia: Implications for clonal evolution and disease progression.

Lagunas-Rangel F Hematol Oncol. 2022; 41(1):26-38.

PMID: 36131612 PMC: 10087755. DOI: 10.1002/hon.3076.


High Expression of DC-STAMP Gene Predicts Adverse Outcomes in AML.

Liang Q, Zhang L, Wang W, Zhao J, Li Q, Pan H Front Genet. 2022; 13:876689.

PMID: 35571050 PMC: 9091727. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.876689.


The NADPH oxidase NOX2 is a marker of adverse prognosis involved in chemoresistance of acute myeloid leukemias.

Paolillo R, Boulanger M, Gatel P, Gabellier L, de Toledo M, Tempe D Haematologica. 2022; 107(11):2562-2575.

PMID: 35172562 PMC: 9614539. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279889.

References
1.
Kayser S, Dohner K, Krauter J, Kohne C, Horst H, Held G . The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML. Blood. 2010; 117(7):2137-45. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-301713. View

2.
Spivak G . Nucleotide excision repair in humans. DNA Repair (Amst). 2015; 36:13-18. PMC: 4688078. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.09.003. View

3.
Wen D, Liao T, Ma B, Qu N, Shi R, Lu Z . Downregulation of CSN6 attenuates papillary thyroid carcinoma progression by reducing Wnt/β-catenin signaling and sensitizes cancer cells to FH535 therapy. Cancer Med. 2018; 7(2):285-296. PMC: 5806103. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1272. View

4.
DAmours D, Jackson S . The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3(5):317-27. DOI: 10.1038/nrm805. View

5.
Curtin N . Inhibiting the DNA damage response as a therapeutic manoeuvre in cancer. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 169(8):1745-65. PMC: 3753833. DOI: 10.1111/bph.12244. View