» Articles » PMID: 33028540

Fifteen Year Quality of Life Outcomes in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: Population Based Australian Prospective Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Oct 8
PMID 33028540
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess treatment related changes in quality of life up to 15 years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.

Design: Population based, prospective cohort study with follow-up over 15 years.

Setting: New South Wales, Australia.

Participants: 1642 men with localised prostate cancer, aged less than 70, and 786 controls randomly recruited from the New South Wales electoral roll into the New South Wales Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes Study (PCOS).

Main Outcome Measures: General health and disease specific quality of life were self-reported at seven time points over a 15 year period, using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey scale, University of California, Los Angeles prostate cancer index, and expanded prostate cancer index composite short form (EPIC-26). Adjusted mean differences were calculated with controls as the comparison group. Clinical significance of adjusted mean differences was assessed by the minimally important difference, defined as one third of the standard deviation (SD) from the baseline score.

Results: At 15 years, all treatment groups reported high levels of erectile dysfunction, depending on treatment (62.3% (active surveillance/watchful waiting, n=33/53) to 83.0% (non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, n=117/141)) compared with controls (42.7% (n=44/103)). Men who had external beam radiation therapy or high dose rate brachytherapy or androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment reported more bowel problems. Self-reported urinary incontinence was particularly prevalent and persistent for men who underwent surgery, and an increase in urinary bother was reported in the group receiving androgen deprivation therapy from 10 to 15 years (year 10: adjusted mean difference -5.3, 95% confidence interval -10.8 to 0.2; year 15: -15.9; -25.1 to -6.7).

Conclusions: Patients receiving initial active treatment for localised prostate cancer had generally worse long term self-reported quality of life than men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Men treated with radical prostatectomy faired especially badly, particularly in relation to long term sexual outcomes. Clinicians and patients should consider these long term quality of life outcomes when making treatment decisions.

Citing Articles

Use of erectile dysfunction treatments after prostate cancer treatment and their perceived impact on men's sex life: an analysis of patient reported outcome survey data.

Charlick M, Tiruye T, Ettridge K, OCallaghan M, Jay A, Beckmann K BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):21.

PMID: 39891173 PMC: 11783798. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01702-0.


Patient and Public Involvement in Pharmacoepidemiological Research: An Environmental Scan of an Emerging Area.

Julie R, Yael B, Anais H, Anne T, Julie H, Marie V Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025; 34(1):e70080.

PMID: 39776060 PMC: 11706696. DOI: 10.1002/pds.70080.


Prevalence of prostate cancer and its grade group stage at diagnosis in patients treated with prostatectomy in rural south western Uganda.

Mugarura R, Lule J, Akello J, Katushabe M, Mugisha J, Maniple E BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):286.

PMID: 39725951 PMC: 11673986. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01683-6.


Trajectories of Cancer Survivors' Spiritual Well-Being Through the Transition From Treatment to Early Survivorship.

Park C, Magin Z, Bellizzi K, Sanft T Psychooncology. 2024; 33(12):e70040.

PMID: 39632284 PMC: 11793928. DOI: 10.1002/pon.70040.


Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments.

Bullen J, Nickel B, McCaffery K, Wilt T, Smith J, Boroumand F BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e085947.

PMID: 39122400 PMC: 11331948. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085947.


References
1.
Smith D, King M, Egger S, Berry M, Stricker P, Cozzi P . Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b4817. PMC: 2784818. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4817. View

2.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

3.
Egger S, Calopedos R, OConnell D, Chambers S, Woo H, Smith D . Long-term Psychological and Quality-of-life Effects of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting After Diagnosis of Low-risk Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017; 73(6):859-867. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.013. View

4.
Skolarus T, Dunn R, Sanda M, Chang P, Greenfield T, Litwin M . Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Urology. 2014; 85(1):101-5. PMC: 4274392. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.044. View

5.
Cocks K, King M, Velikova G, Martyn St-James M, Fayers P, Brown J . Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 29(1):89-96. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0107. View