» Articles » PMID: 23363497

Long-term Functional Outcomes After Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this analysis was to compare long-term urinary, bowel, and sexual function after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy.

Methods: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study (PCOS) enrolled 3533 men in whom prostate cancer had been diagnosed in 1994 or 1995. The current cohort comprised 1655 men in whom localized prostate cancer had been diagnosed between the ages of 55 and 74 years and who had undergone either surgery (1164 men) or radiotherapy (491 men). Functional status was assessed at baseline and at 2, 5, and 15 years after diagnosis. We used multivariable propensity scoring to compare functional outcomes according to treatment.

Results: Patients undergoing prostatectomy were more likely to have urinary incontinence than were those undergoing radiotherapy at 2 years (odds ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92 to 20.29) and 5 years (odds ratio, 5.10; 95% CI, 2.29 to 11.36). However, no significant between-group difference in the odds of urinary incontinence was noted at 15 years. Similarly, although patients undergoing prostatectomy were more likely to have erectile dysfunction at 2 years (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.93 to 6.17) and 5 years (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.05 to 3.63), no significant between-group difference was noted at 15 years. Patients undergoing prostatectomy were less likely to have bowel urgency at 2 years (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.68) and 5 years (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.84), again with no significant between-group difference in the odds of bowel urgency at 15 years.

Conclusions: At 15 years, no significant relative differences in disease-specific functional outcomes were observed among men undergoing prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Nonetheless, men treated for localized prostate cancer commonly had declines in all functional domains during 15 years of follow-up. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).

Citing Articles

A Qualitative Exploration of Factors Influencing Prostate Cancer Adjustment Among Older Adults: A Social Ecological Model.

Nakhodaeezadeh M, Fadayevatan R, Foroughan M, Raeesi Dehkordi F, Zanjari N Am J Mens Health. 2025; 19(2):15579883251315177.

PMID: 40077885 PMC: 11905018. DOI: 10.1177/15579883251315177.


Exercise and Psychosexual Education to Improve Sexual Function in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Galvao D, Newton R, Taaffe D, Cormie P, Schumacher O, Nelson C JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250413.

PMID: 40072437 PMC: 11904736. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0413.


Functional outcomes after primary vs delayed robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following active surveillance.

Corsini C, Scilipoti P, Orrason A, Gedeborg R, Westerberg M, Stattin P JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025; 9(2).

PMID: 39913357 PMC: 11884805. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf020.


Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Decision Regret After Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Radioguided Surgery for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

Falkenbach F, Mazzucato G, Tian Z, Karakiewicz P, Graefen M, Steuber T Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025; 70():1-7.

PMID: 39822239 PMC: 11736159. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.09.010.


Cost-utility analysis of MR imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.

Muhler P, Akuamoa-Boateng D, Rosenbrock J, Stock S, Muller D, Heidenreich A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088495.

PMID: 39800402 PMC: 11752021. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088495.


References
1.
Song L, Chen R, Bensen J, Knafl G, Nielsen M, Farnan L . Who makes the decision regarding the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer--the patient or physician?: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2012; 119(2):421-8. PMC: 7671233. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27738. View

2.
Taylor K, Luta G, Miller A, Church T, Kelly S, Muenz L . Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(22):2768-75. PMC: 4166119. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2767. View

3.
Ihrig A, Keller M, Hartmann M, Debus J, Pfitzenmaier J, Hadaschik B . Treatment decision-making in localized prostate cancer: why patients chose either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. BJU Int. 2011; 108(8):1274-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10082.x. View

4.
Sanda M, Dunn R, Michalski J, Sandler H, Northouse L, Hembroff L . Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(12):1250-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311. View

5.
Knight S, Latini D, Hart S, Sadetsky N, Kane C, DuChane J . Education predicts quality of life among men with prostate cancer cared for in the Department of Veterans Affairs: a longitudinal quality of life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer. 2007; 109(9):1769-76. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22597. View