» Articles » PMID: 33024236

Machine Learning-guided Discovery and Design of Non-hemolytic Peptides

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Oct 7
PMID 33024236
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reducing hurdles to clinical trials without compromising the therapeutic promises of peptide candidates becomes an essential step in peptide-based drug design. Machine-learning models are cost-effective and time-saving strategies used to predict biological activities from primary sequences. Their limitations lie in the diversity of peptide sequences and biological information within these models. Additional outlier detection methods are needed to set the boundaries for reliable predictions; the applicability domain. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) constitute an extensive library of peptides offering promising avenues against antibiotic-resistant infections. Most AMPs present in clinical trials are administrated topically due to their hemolytic toxicity. Here we developed machine learning models and outlier detection methods that ensure robust predictions for the discovery of AMPs and the design of novel peptides with reduced hemolytic activity. Our best models, gradient boosting classifiers, predicted the hemolytic nature from any peptide sequence with 95-97% accuracy. Nearly 70% of AMPs were predicted as hemolytic peptides. Applying multivariate outlier detection models, we found that 273 AMPs (~ 9%) could not be predicted reliably. Our combined approach led to the discovery of 34 high-confidence non-hemolytic natural AMPs, the de novo design of 507 non-hemolytic peptides, and the guidelines for non-hemolytic peptide design.

Citing Articles

Deciphering optimal molecular determinants of non-hemolytic, cell-penetrating antimicrobial peptides through bioinformatics and Random Forest.

Kumar A, Chadha S, Sharma M, Kumar M Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1).

PMID: 39973083 PMC: 11839508. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf049.


Prediction of hemolytic peptides and their hemolytic concentration.

Rathore A, Kumar N, Choudhury S, Mehta N, Raghava G Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):176.

PMID: 39905233 PMC: 11794569. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07615-w.


Machine learning for antimicrobial peptide identification and design.

Wan F, Wong F, Collins J, de la Fuente-Nunez C Nat Rev Bioeng. 2025; 2(5):392-407.

PMID: 39850516 PMC: 11756916. DOI: 10.1038/s44222-024-00152-x.


Therapeutic peptide development revolutionized: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for drug discovery.

Hashemi S, Vosough P, Taghizadeh S, Savardashtaki A Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40265.

PMID: 39605829 PMC: 11600032. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40265.


Enhanced prediction of hemolytic activity in antimicrobial peptides using deep learning-based sequence analysis.

Abdelbaky I, Elhakeem M, Tayara H, Badr E, Abdul Salam M BMC Bioinformatics. 2024; 25(1):368.

PMID: 39604856 PMC: 11603801. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05983-4.


References
1.
Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T . Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2014; 20(1):122-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003. View

2.
Lau J, Dunn M . Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions. Bioorg Med Chem. 2017; 26(10):2700-2707. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.06.052. View

3.
Fernandez de Ullivarri M, Arbulu S, Garcia-Gutierrez E, Cotter P . Antifungal Peptides as Therapeutic Agents. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020; 10:105. PMC: 7089922. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00105. View

4.
Nyanguile O . Peptide Antiviral Strategies as an Alternative to Treat Lower Respiratory Viral Infections. Front Immunol. 2019; 10:1366. PMC: 6598224. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01366. View

5.
McGregor D . Discovering and improving novel peptide therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008; 8(5):616-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.06.002. View