» Articles » PMID: 33022659

STARCH: Copy Number and Clone Inference from Spatial Transcriptomics Data

Overview
Journal Phys Biol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2020 Oct 6
PMID 33022659
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tumors are highly heterogeneous, consisting of cell populations with both transcriptional and genetic diversity. These diverse cell populations are spatially organized within a tumor, creating a distinct tumor microenvironment. A new technology called spatial transcriptomics can measure spatial patterns of gene expression within a tissue by sequencing RNA transcripts from a grid of spots, each containing a small number of cells. In tumor cells, these gene expression patterns represent the combined contribution of regulatory mechanisms, which alter the rate at which a gene is transcribed, and genetic diversity, particularly copy number aberrations (CNAs) which alter the number of copies of a gene in the genome. CNAs are common in tumors and often promote cancer growth through upregulation of oncogenes or downregulation of tumor-suppressor genes. We introduce a new method STARCH (spatial transcriptomics algorithm reconstructing copy-number heterogeneity) to infer CNAs from spatial transcriptomics data. STARCH overcomes challenges in inferring CNAs from RNA-sequencing data by leveraging the observation that cells located nearby in a tumor are likely to share similar CNAs. We find that STARCH outperforms existing methods for inferring CNAs from RNA-sequencing data without incorporating spatial information.

Citing Articles

Clonal phylogenies inferred from bulk, single cell, and spatial transcriptomic analysis of epithelial cancers.

Erickson A, Figiel S, Rajakumar T, Rao S, Yin W, Doultsinos D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316475.

PMID: 39752458 PMC: 11698422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316475.


SpottedPy quantifies relationships between spatial transcriptomic hotspots and uncovers environmental cues of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in breast cancer.

Withnell E, Secrier M Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):289.

PMID: 39529126 PMC: 11552145. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03428-y.


Inferring allele-specific copy number aberrations and tumor phylogeography from spatially resolved transcriptomics.

Ma C, Balaban M, Liu J, Chen S, Wilson M, Sun C Nat Methods. 2024; 21(12):2239-2247.

PMID: 39478176 PMC: 11621028. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02438-9.


Integrative spatial and genomic analysis of tumor heterogeneity with Tumoroscope.

Shafighi S, Geras A, Jurzysta B, Sahaf Naeini A, Filipiuk I, Raczkowska A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9343.

PMID: 39472583 PMC: 11522407. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53374-3.


Next-generation spatial transcriptomics: unleashing the power to gear up translational oncology.

Wang N, Hong W, Wu Y, Chen Z, Bai M, Wang W MedComm (2020). 2024; 5(10):e765.

PMID: 39376738 PMC: 11456678. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.765.


References
1.
Stahl P, Salmen F, Vickovic S, Lundmark A, Fernandez Navarro J, Magnusson J . Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016; 353(6294):78-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2403. View

2.
Zaccaria S, Raphael B . Accurate quantification of copy-number aberrations and whole-genome duplications in multi-sample tumor sequencing data. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):4301. PMC: 7468132. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17967-y. View

3.
Ha G, Roth A, Khattra J, Ho J, Yap D, Prentice L . TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2014; 24(11):1881-93. PMC: 4216928. DOI: 10.1101/gr.180281.114. View

4.
Casasent A, Schalck A, Gao R, Sei E, Long A, Pangburn W . Multiclonal Invasion in Breast Tumors Identified by Topographic Single Cell Sequencing. Cell. 2018; 172(1-2):205-217.e12. PMC: 5766405. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.007. View

5.
Garvin T, Aboukhalil R, Kendall J, Baslan T, Atwal G, Hicks J . Interactive analysis and assessment of single-cell copy-number variations. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(11):1058-60. PMC: 4775251. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3578. View