» Articles » PMID: 33014428

Scaling Up: Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts Beyond the Individual

Overview
Journal Citiz Sci
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33014428
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the application of citizen science expands to address increasingly complex social problems (e.g., community health), there is opportunity to consider higher-order engagement beyond that of individual members of a community. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to foster public engagement in science through Smoke Sense, which is a citizen science research project that aims to reduce the public health burden of wildland fire smoke. Smoke Sense is facilitated by a mobile app that shares information on air quality, smoke, and health, and collects individual reports of smoke exposure and concurrent health symptoms. However, Smoke Sense is also generating interest among organizations that are working in this problem domain at the local, state, national, and tribal levels. The interest in the citizen science project at the organizational level led us to ask: What would motivate members of organizations to engage in a citizen science project like Smoke Sense, and how do they envision that engagement could improve public health? To explore these questions, we collected data through interviews with individuals who were engaged in Smoke Sense through their work at local, state, and tribal environmental and health agencies in the western US. An inductive, thematic analysis suggests that individuals' motivations stem from their experiences and challenges with smoke in their different roles (e.g., personal, professional, and community member). Respondents envisioned leveraging both the app itself and the data generated by individuals in their region to enhance and support their existing outreach and communication efforts related to smoke. Citizen science projects that aim to address issues in complex problem domains should be designed to complement the work of partner organizations.

Citing Articles

What's in it for citizen scientists? An Analysis of Participant Inclusivity in Citizen Science Projects in Advanced Physics Research.

Unterfrauner E, Fabian C, Hemming G, Garcia B Open Res Eur. 2024; 4():124.

PMID: 39524110 PMC: 11549546. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.17436.2.


Knowledge, attitudes and practices about air pollution and its health effects in 6th to 11th-grade students in Colombia: a cross-sectional study.

Marin D, Calle N, Arango V, Betancur P, Perez M, Orozco L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1390780.

PMID: 38962783 PMC: 11221384. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390780.


Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.

Torro-Pons C, Saus-Ortega C, Ballestar-Tarin M Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(2):946-960.

PMID: 38651484 PMC: 11036250. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14020072.


A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.

Vien M, Ivey S, Boyden H, Holm S, Neuhauser L BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):312.

PMID: 38281022 PMC: 10822163. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0.


The case for citizen science in public health policy and practice: a mixed methods study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives and experiences.

Marks L, Smith B, Mitchell J, Laird Y, Rowbotham S Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21(1):31.

PMID: 37127620 PMC: 10152701. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00978-8.


References
1.
Braun K, Nguyen T, Tanjasiri S, Campbell J, Heiney S, Brandt H . Operationalization of community-based participatory research principles: assessment of the national cancer institute's community network programs. Am J Public Health. 2011; 102(6):1195-203. PMC: 3292685. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304. View

2.
Irwin A . No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research. Nature. 2018; 562(7728):480-482. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07106-5. View

3.
Morse J . Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015; 25(9):1212-22. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315588501. View

4.
Cacari-Stone L, Wallerstein N, Garcia A, Minkler M . The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(9):1615-23. PMC: 4151933. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961. View

5.
Foster-Fishman P, Nowell B, Yang H . Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2007; 39(3-4):197-215. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9109-0. View