» Articles » PMID: 32432070

Knowing Your Audience: A Typology of Smoke Sense Participants to Inform Wildfire Smoke Health Risk Communication

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 May 21
PMID 32432070
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Central to public health risk communication is understanding the perspectives and shared values among individuals who need the information. Using the responses from a Smoke Sense citizen science project, we examined perspectives on the issue of wildfire smoke as a health risk in relation to an individual's preparedness to adopt recommended health behaviors. The Smoke Sense smartphone application provides wildfire-related health risk resources and invites participants to record their perspectives on the issue of wildfire smoke. Within the app, participants can explore current and forecasted daily air quality, maps of fire locations, satellite images of smoke plumes, and learn about health consequences of wildfire smoke. We used cluster analysis to identify perspective trait-clusters based on health status, experience with fire smoke, risk perception, self-efficacy, access to exposure-reducing resources, health information needs, and openness to health risk messaging. Differences between traits were examined based on demographics, health status, activity level and engagement with the app. We mapped these traits to the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to indicate where each trait lies in adopting recommended health behaviors. Finally, we suggest messaging strategies that may be suitable for each trait. We determined five distinct perspective traits which included individuals who were and have decided to engage on the issue by adopting new behaviors to protect their health; individuals who were at a stage but differed based on risk perceptions and information needs; and the who did not perceive smoke as a health issue and were unlikely to change behavior in response to messaging. Across all five traits, the level of engagement and information needs differed substantially, but were not defined by demographics. Individuals in the trait had the highest level of engagement and the highest information needs. Messaging that emphasizes self-efficacy and benefits of reducing exposure may be effective in motivating individuals from the deciding stage to taking health protective action. Shared perspectives define an individual's propensity for acting on recommended health behaviors, therefore, health risk message content should be tailored based on these perspectives.

Citing Articles

Symptoms Reported by Young Adults With Asthma During Wildfire Smoke Season.

Postma J, Bindler R, Haverkamp H, Walden V J Adolesc Health. 2024; 75(6):974-977.

PMID: 39340501 PMC: 11568906. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.07.026.


Behavioral Responses to Wildfire Smoke: A Case Study in Western Montana.

Stewart T, Monroe A, Mullan K, Jones D, McIver A, Walker E J Community Health. 2024; 50(1):31-44.

PMID: 39183232 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01390-1.


Motivating parents to protect their children from wildfire smoke: the impact of air quality index infographics.

Slavik C, Chapman D, Smith H, Coughlan M, Peters E Environ Res Commun. 2024; 6(7):075001.

PMID: 38974835 PMC: 11223187. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad5931.


Knowledge, attitudes and practices about air pollution and its health effects in 6th to 11th-grade students in Colombia: a cross-sectional study.

Marin D, Calle N, Arango V, Betancur P, Perez M, Orozco L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1390780.

PMID: 38962783 PMC: 11221384. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390780.


A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.

Vien M, Ivey S, Boyden H, Holm S, Neuhauser L BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):312.

PMID: 38281022 PMC: 10822163. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0.


References
1.
Glik D . Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28:33-54. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123. View

2.
Manuel J . Crisis and emergency risk communication lessons from the Elk River spill. Environ Health Perspect. 2014; 122(8):A214-9. PMC: 4122537. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.122-A214. View

3.
Albarracin D, Gillette J, Earl A, Glasman L, Durantini M, Ho M . A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychol Bull. 2005; 131(6):856-97. PMC: 2713787. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856. View

4.
Rappold A, Cascio W, Kilaru V, Stone S, Neas L, Devlin R . Cardio-respiratory outcomes associated with exposure to wildfire smoke are modified by measures of community health. Environ Health. 2012; 11:71. PMC: 3506568. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-71. View

5.
Hano M, Wei L, Hubbell B, Rappold A . Scaling Up: Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts Beyond the Individual. Citiz Sci. 2020; 5(1):1-13. PMC: 7529103. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.244. View