» Articles » PMID: 33014414

In Vivo Bone Regeneration Assessment of Offset and Gradient Melt Electrowritten (MEW) PCL Scaffolds

Overview
Journal Biomater Res
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33014414
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Biomaterial-based bone tissue engineering represents a promising solution to overcome reduced residual bone volume. It has been previously demonstrated that gradient and offset architectures of three-dimensional melt electrowritten poly-caprolactone (PCL) scaffolds could successfully direct osteoblast cells differentiation toward an osteogenic lineage, resulting in mineralization. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the in vivo osteoconductive capacity of PCL scaffolds with these different architectures.

Methods: Five different calcium phosphate (CaP) coated melt electrowritten PCL pore sized scaffolds: 250 μm and 500 μm, 500 μm with 50% fibre offset (offset.50.50), tri layer gradient 250-500-750 μm (grad.250top) and 750-500-250 μm (grad.750top) were implanted into rodent critical-sized calvarial defects. Empty defects were used as a control. After 4 and 8 weeks of healing, the new bone was assessed by micro-computed tomography and immunohistochemistry.

Results: Significantly more newly formed bone was shown in the grad.250top scaffold 8 weeks post-implantation. Histological investigation also showed that soft tissue was replaced with newly formed bone and fully covered the grad.250top scaffold. While, the bone healing did not happen completely in the 250 μm, offset.50.50 scaffolds and blank calvaria defects following 8 weeks of implantation. Immunohistochemical analysis showed the expression of osteogenic markers was present in all scaffold groups at both time points. The mineralization marker Osteocalcin was detected with the highest intensity in the grad.250top and 500 μm scaffolds. Moreover, the expression of the endothelial markers showed that robust angiogenesis was involved in the repair process.

Conclusions: These results suggest that the gradient pore size structure provides superior conditions for bone regeneration.

Citing Articles

Niche-inspired collagen infused melt electrowritten scaffolds for craniofacial bone regeneration.

Daghrery A, Dal-Fabbro R, Xu J, Kaigler D, de Ruijter M, Gawlitta D Biomater Adv. 2025; 170:214222.

PMID: 39923603 PMC: 11893008. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214222.


Enhancing craniofacial bone tissue engineering strategy: integrating rapid wet chemically synthesised bioactive glass with photopolymerized resins.

Qasim S, Tufail Shah A, Daood U, Matalqah M, Habib S, Saoud K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1195.

PMID: 39379857 PMC: 11462732. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04978-0.


Integrating Melt Electrowriting and Fused Deposition Modeling to Fabricate Hybrid Scaffolds Supportive of Accelerated Bone Regeneration.

Eichholz K, Pitacco P, Burdis R, Chariyev-Prinz F, Barcelo X, Tornifoglio B Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 13(3):e2302057.

PMID: 37933556 PMC: 11468945. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202302057.


ZIF-8 induced hydroxyapatite-like crystals enabled superior osteogenic ability of MEW printing PCL scaffolds.

Wang B, Zeng Y, Liu S, Zhou M, Fang H, Wang Z J Nanobiotechnology. 2023; 21(1):264.

PMID: 37563652 PMC: 10413775. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-02007-w.


FLIM imaging revealed spontaneous osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on gradient pore size tissue-engineered constructs.

Rodimova S, Mozherov A, Elagin V, Karabut M, Shchechkin I, Kozlov D Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023; 14(1):81.

PMID: 37046354 PMC: 10091689. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03307-6.


References
1.
Aldemir Dikici B, Dikici S, Reilly G, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F . A Novel Bilayer Polycaprolactone Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration: Combining Electrospinning and Emulsion Templating. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(16). PMC: 6721100. DOI: 10.3390/ma12162643. View

2.
Abbasi N, Ivanovski S, Gulati K, Love R, Hamlet S . Role of offset and gradient architectures of 3-D melt electrowritten scaffold on differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts. Biomater Res. 2020; 24:2. PMC: 6942301. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-019-0180-z. View

3.
Wu L, Zhao X, He B, Jiang J, Xie X, Liu L . The Possible Roles of Biological Bone Constructed with Peripheral Blood Derived EPCs and BMSCs in Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:8168943. PMC: 4852345. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8168943. View

4.
Barcellos de Santana R, de Mattos C, Francischone C, Van Dyke T . Superficial topography and porosity of an absorbable barrier membrane impacts soft tissue response in guided bone regeneration. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(6):926-33. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090592. View

5.
Yang Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Hu X, Kawazoe N, Yang Y . Influence of Cell Spreading Area on the Osteogenic Commitment and Phenotype Maintenance of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6891. PMC: 6499796. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43362-9. View