» Articles » PMID: 33013552

Preschoolers Benefit Equally From Video Chat, Pseudo-Contingent Video, and Live Book Reading: Implications for Storytime During the Coronavirus Pandemic and Beyond

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33013552
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the unprecedented coronavirus disease (COVID-19) crisis, virtual education activities have become more prevalent than ever. One activity that many families have incorporated into their routines while at home is virtual storytime, with teachers, grandparents, and other remote adults reading books to children over video chat. The current study asks how dialogic reading over video chat compares to more traditional forms of book reading in promoting story comprehension and vocabulary learning. Fifty-eight 4-year-olds ( = 52.7, = 4.04, 31 girls) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (Video chat, Live, and Prerecorded). Across conditions, children were read the same narrative storybook by a female experimenter who used the same 10 scripted dialogic reading prompts during book reading. In the ( = 21) and ( = 18), the experimenter gave the scripted prompts and interacted naturally and , responding in a timely, relevant manner to children's behaviors. In the ( = 19), children viewed a video of an experimenter reading the book. The Prerecorded condition was ; the reader posed questions and paused for a set period of time as if to wait for a child's response. After reading, children completed measures of vocabulary and comprehension. Results revealed no differences between conditions across six different outcome measures, suggesting that children comprehended and learned from the story similarly across book formats. Further, children in the three experimental conditions scored significantly higher on measures than children in a fourth condition (control) who had never read the book, confirming that children learned from the three different book formats. However, children were more responsive to the prompts in the and conditions than the condition, suggesting that children recognized that these interactions were contingent with their responses, a feature that was lacking in the condition. Results indicate that children can comprehend books over video chat, suggesting that this technology is a viable option for reading to children, especially during the current pandemic.

Citing Articles

Virtual Teaching Together: engaging parents and young children in STEM activities.

Zucker T, Mesa M, Assel M, McCallum C, DeMaster D Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1334195.

PMID: 38379841 PMC: 10876996. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1334195.


Reexamining models of early learning in the digital age: Applications for learning in the wild.

Barr R, Kirkorian H J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2024; 12(4):457-472.

PMID: 38223884 PMC: 10783145. DOI: 10.1037/mac0000132.


The challenge of screen mediated shared reading for children's learning and engagement.

Read K, Harrison H, Mireku B, Ying K Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1212173.

PMID: 37575448 PMC: 10416098. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212173.


Reducing harm and promoting positive media use strategies: new perspectives in understanding the impact of preschooler media use on health and development.

Fitzpatrick C, Binet M, Cristini E, Almeida M, Begin M, Frizzo G Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023; 36(1):19.

PMID: 37553485 PMC: 10409691. DOI: 10.1186/s41155-023-00262-2.


Effects of remote learning during COVID-19 lockdown on children's learning abilities and school performance: A systematic review.

Cortes-Albornoz M, Ramirez-Guerrero S, Garcia-Guaqueta D, Velez-Van-Meerbeke A, Talero-Gutierrez C Int J Educ Dev. 2023; 101:102835.

PMID: 37361921 PMC: 10266495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102835.


References
1.
Kirkorian H, Choi K . Associations Between Toddlers' Naturalistic Media Experience and Observed Learning from Screens. Infancy. 2020; 22(2):271-277. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12171. View

2.
Hirsh-Pasek K, Zosh J, Golinkoff R, Gray J, Robb M, Kaufman J . Putting education in "educational" apps: lessons from the science of learning. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015; 16(1):3-34. DOI: 10.1177/1529100615569721. View

3.
Berkule S, Dreyer B, Huberman H, Fierman A, Mendelsohn A . Attitudes about shared reading among at-risk mothers of newborn babies. Ambul Pediatr. 2007; 7(1):45-50. PMC: 1859852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.10.004. View

4.
Romeo R, Leonard J, Robinson S, West M, Mackey A, Rowe M . Beyond the 30-Million-Word Gap: Children's Conversational Exposure Is Associated With Language-Related Brain Function. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(5):700-710. PMC: 5945324. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617742725. View

5.
Mollborn S, Lawrence E, James-Hawkins L, Fomby P . When Do Socioeconomic Resources Matter Most in Early Childhood?. Adv Life Course Res. 2014; 20:56-59. PMC: 4242154. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2014.03.001. View