» Articles » PMID: 33000079

Emergency Department Observation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Minor Radiographic Findings: Shorter Stays, Less Expensive, and No Increased Risk Compared to Hospital Admission

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Oct 1
PMID 33000079
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with minor radiographic findings traditionally involves hospital admission for monitoring, although this practice is expensive with unclear benefit. We implemented a protocol to manage these patients in our emergency department observation unit (EDOU), hypothesizing that this pathway was cost effective and not associated with any difference in clinical outcome.

Methods: mTBI patients with minor radiographic findings were managed under the EDOU protocol over a 3-year period from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2018 (inclusions: ≥19 years old, isolated acute head trauma, normal neurological exam [except transient alteration in consciousness], and a computed tomography [CT] scan of the head with at least 1 of the following: cerebral contusions <1 cm in maximum extent, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, or closed, non-displaced skull fractures). These patients were retrospectively analyzed; clinical outcomes and charges were compared to a control cohort of matched mTBI hospital admissions over the preceding 3 years.

Results: Sixty patients were observed in the EDOU over the 3-year period, and 85 patients were identified for the control cohort. There were no differences in rate of radiographic progression, neurological exam change, or surgical intervention, and the overall incidence of hemorrhagic expansion was low in both groups. The EDOU group had a significantly faster time to interval CT scan (Mean Difference (MD) 3.92 hours, [95%CI 1.65, 6.19]), = 0.001), shorter length of stay (MD 0.59 days [95% CI 0.29, 0.89], = 0.001), and lower encounter charges (MD $3428.51 [95%CI 925.60, 5931.42], = 0.008). There were no differences in 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, or delayed chronic subdural formation, although there was a high rate of loss to follow-up in both groups.

Conclusions: Compared to hospital admission, observing mTBI patients with minor radiographic findings in the EDOU was associated with significantly shorter time to interval scanning, shorter length of stay, and lower encounter charges, but no difference in observed clinical outcome. The overall risk of hemorrhagic progression in this subset of mTBI was very low. Using this approach can reduce unnecessary admissions while potentially yielding patient care and economic benefits. When designing a protocol, close attention should be given to clear inclusion criteria and a formal mechanism for patient follow-up.

Citing Articles

Hospital admission of older patients with mild traumatic brain injury and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: is it always necessary?.

Santing J, Van Gent M, van den Brand C, van der Naalt J, Jellema K Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):8.

PMID: 39799536 PMC: 11725537. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02671-z.


Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on Head Computed Tomography Scan May Not Be Isolated: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study (TRACK-TBI) Study.

Yue J, Yuh E, Elguindy M, Sun X, van Essen T, Deng H J Neurotrauma. 2024; 41(11-12):1310-1322.

PMID: 38450561 PMC: 11564841. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0253.


Comparison of the predictive value of two international guidelines for safe discharge of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries and associated intracranial pathology.

Vestlund S, Tryggmo S, Vedin T, Larsson P, Edelhamre M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; 48(6):4489-4497.

PMID: 34859266 PMC: 9712145. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01842-6.


Emergency department observation of mild traumatic brain injury with minor radiographic findings: shorter stays, less expensive, and no increased risk compared to hospital admission.

Root B, Kanter J, Calnan D, Reyes-Zaragosa M, Gill H, Lanter P J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020; 1(4):609-617.

PMID: 33000079 PMC: 7493558. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12124.

References
1.
McDermott M, Murphy D, Zalenski R, Rydman R, McCarren M, Marder D . A comparison between emergency diagnostic and treatment unit and inpatient care in the management of acute asthma. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157(18):2055-62. View

2.
Ismail M, Doherty K, Bradshaw P, OSullivan I, Cassidy E . Symptom-triggered therapy for assessment and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the emergency department short-stay clinical decision unit. Emerg Med J. 2018; 36(1):18-21. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206997. View

3.
Marincowitz C, Lecky F, Townend W, Borakati A, Fabbri A, Sheldon T . The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13-15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018; 35(5):703-718. PMC: 5831640. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5259. View

4.
Holm L, Cassidy J, Carroll L, Borg J . Summary of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Neurotrauma Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37(3):137-41. DOI: 10.1080/16501970510027321. View

5.
Ross M, Aurora T, Graff L, Suri P, OMalley R, Ojo A . State of the art: emergency department observation units. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012; 11(3):128-38. DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31825def28. View