» Articles » PMID: 32991748

To Dine in or Not to Dine In: A Comparison of Food Selection and Preparation Behaviours in Those with and Without Food Security

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Sep 29
PMID 32991748
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Issue Addressed: Vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by food insecurity, resulting in heightened risk of suboptimal dietary intake. Food insecure people appear to implement several coping strategies and dietary compromises to avoid hunger. Less explored in the literature is how these strategies impact consumption of food inside and outside of the home.

Methods: An online survey was completed by adults (n = 1292) residing in one of five Australian states. The questionnaire comprised of the six-item US Household Food Security Survey Module, 12 socio-demographic variables and 32 questions related to elements of food literacy.

Results: Food insecure respondents were more likely to frequent fast food vs (P = .002), takeaway (P < .001) and food courts (P < .001) than their food secure counterparts. Food secure respondents reported greater use of raw (P = .043) and fresh, pre-prepared produce (P = .002) when cooking, whereas food insecure respondents were more likely to prepare food using only frozen, pre-packaged products (P < .001). No significant differences were found between food security status and the enjoyment and social bonding derived from cooking.

Conclusions: Food insecure respondents appeared to be accessing a poorer quality of food through greater consumption of takeaway and fast food. These dietary compromises are most likely related to perceived financial, time or cooking facility constraints and to a lesser extent food literacy skills. SO WHAT?: This study highlights some of the health and social inequities apparent within food insecure populations. Food insecure households should be supported to access healthy fresh food and in-home cooking practices. While a multi strategy approach is required, healthy food environment policy, particularly in disadvantaged areas, should be considered to guarantee that all Australians have dignified access to nutritious food.

Citing Articles

Narrative review: food as medicine across the pediatric age continuum.

Fischer L, Muleta H, Essel K Curr Opin Pediatr. 2023; 36(1):23-32.

PMID: 37965886 PMC: 10763717. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001313.


Association between Quality of Maternal Prenatal Food Source and Preparation and Breastfeeding Duration in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Program.

Zimmerman E, Gachigi K, Rodgers R, Watkins D, Woodbury M, Cordero J Nutrients. 2022; 14(22).

PMID: 36432608 PMC: 9695213. DOI: 10.3390/nu14224922.


To dine in or not to dine in: A comparison of food selection and preparation behaviours in those with and without food security.

Butcher L, OSullivan T, Ryan M, Lo J, Nyanjom J, Wilkins H Health Promot J Austr. 2020; 32 Suppl 2:267-282.

PMID: 32991748 PMC: 8597035. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.427.

References
1.
Pollard C, Nyaradi A, Lester M, Sauer K . Understanding food security issues in remote Western Australian Indigenous communities. Health Promot J Austr. 2014; 25(2):83-9. DOI: 10.1071/HE14044. View

2.
McKay F, Haines B, Dunn M . Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(3). PMC: 6388276. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030476. View

3.
Butcher L, OSullivan T, Ryan M, Lo J, Devine A . Utilising a multi-item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia. Health Promot J Austr. 2018; 30(1):9-17. PMC: 6907406. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.61. View

4.
Bryan A, Ginsburg Z, Rubinstein E, Frankel H, Maroko A, Schechter C . Foods and Drinks Available from Urban Food Pantries: Nutritional Quality by Item Type, Sourcing, and Distribution Method. J Community Health. 2018; 44(2):339-364. PMC: 6414256. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-018-0592-z. View

5.
Mills S, Brown H, Wrieden W, White M, Adams J . Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):109. PMC: 5561571. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0567-y. View