» Articles » PMID: 32986733

Digitally Engaged Physicians About the Digital Health Transition

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Sep 28
PMID 32986733
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Digitalisation affects 90% of healthcare. Digital health, however, does not only refer to technological transformation but also has considerable cultural and social consequences. It fundamentally reshapes the roles of physicians and patients, as well as their relationship. Moreover, from the second half of the 20th century, the growing number of chronic patients and the increase in life expectancy have posed new challenges to the medical workforce.

Objectives: To explore the digitally engaged physician's knowledge and attitudes towards digital health technologies and the transformation of the doctor-patient relationship.

Methods: A qualitative interview study analysed with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The study is based on qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 11 digitally engaged physicians from 9 countries. We identified four main themes emerging from e-physicians' responses and experience: 1) the past: intentions and experiences of change, 2) the present: the role of digital health and technology in the medical practice and their everyday challenges, 3) the present: the practical and ideal physician-patient relationship, and 4) the future: skills and competencies needed for working with e-patients and visions about the future of the medical practice.

Results: The interviewed physicians state that digital health solutions could create a deeper doctor-patient relationship: knowledgeable patients are a huge help in the joint work effort and technology is the main tool for creating a more involved and responsible patient. Medical professionals in the future might rather get a role as a translator between technical data and the patient; as a guide in the jungle of digital health. However, the interviewed physicians also noted that digital transition today is more beneficial to patients than to their doctors.

Conclusions: We state that digitally engaged physicians are characterized by a kind of dichotomy: they use digital opportunities enthusiastically, but they also feel the difficulties related to digital health.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the digital future: perspectives of Hungarian physicians under 35 years old on eHealth solutions.

Gyorffy Z, Dobrossy B, Boros J, Girasek E Front Digit Health. 2025; 6:1464642.

PMID: 39931649 PMC: 11808301. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1464642.


Cost-effectiveness of the Floodlight MS app in Austria. Unlocking the mystery of costs and outcomes of a digital health application for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Walter E, Traunfellner M, Meyer F, Enzinger C, Guger M, Bsteh C Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251314550.

PMID: 39911717 PMC: 11795621. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251314550.


Perceptions of eHealth and digitalization among professional anaesthesia personnel: A Swedish national study.

Jildenstal P, Viseu C, Hermander K, Sjoberg C, Hallen K, Schnorbus R Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025; 69(3):e14587.

PMID: 39887990 PMC: 11781013. DOI: 10.1111/aas.14587.


The engagement of healthcare providers in implementing the selfBACK randomised controlled trial - A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Stochkendahl M, Nicholl B, Wood K, Mair F, Mork P, Sogaard K Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076241313159.

PMID: 39845520 PMC: 11752214. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241313159.


The Co-Piloting Model for Using Artificial Intelligence Systems in Medicine: Implementing the Constrained-Disorder-Principle-Based Second-Generation System.

Ilan Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593770 PMC: 11592301. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111111.


References
1.
Sacristan J . Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13:6. PMC: 3575265. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-6. View

2.
McLawhorn A, Martino I, Fehring K, Sculco P . Social media and your practice: navigating the surgeon-patient relationship. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(4):487-495. PMC: 5127956. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9376-1. View

3.
Ferguson T, Frydman G . The first generation of e-patients. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449):1148-9. PMC: 411079. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148. View

4.
Justinia T, Alyami A, Al-Qahtani S, Bashanfar M, El-Khatib M, Yahya A . Social Media and the Orthopaedic Surgeon: a Mixed Methods Study. Acta Inform Med. 2019; 27(1):23-28. PMC: 6511278. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2019.27.23-28. View

5.
Doyle R, Wang N, Anthony D, Borkan J, Shield R, Goldman R . Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation. Fam Pract. 2012; 29(5):601-8. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms015. View