Autonomous Surgery in the Era of Robotic Urology: Friend or Foe of the Future Surgeon?

Overview

Journal Nat Rev Urol

Specialty Urology

Date 2020 Sep 24

PMID 32968240

Citations 7

Authors

Martin J Connor

Prokar Dasgupta

Hashim U Ahmed

Asif Raza

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Despite advances in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the past two decades, control of the robotic system currently remains under the command of a human surgeon. Historically, urology has pioneered new surgical techniques and technologies. Now, autonomous RAS is on the horizon and the first data from clinical trials of autonomous RAS in urology are being published. Automation takes control away from the surgeon but promises standardization of techniques, increased efficiency, potentially reduced complication rates and new ways of integrating intra-operative imaging. Preclinical and clinical evidence is emerging that supports the use of autonomous robotic-assisted urological surgery. Use of autonomous technologies in the operating theatre will directly affect the role of the urological surgeon. Integration of autonomous RAS can be viewed as a positive aid, but it might also be perceived as a threat to the future urological surgeon.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence in the management of prostate cancer.

Khanna R, Martinez A, Raison N, Ourselin S, Briganti A, Montorsi F Nat Rev Urol. 2024; 22(3):125-126.

PMID: 39232058 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00938-z.

Advanced surgical tool: Progress in clinical application of intelligent surgical robot.

Li C, Zhang T, Wang H, Hou Z, Zhang Y, Chen W Smart Med. 2024; 1(1):e20220021.

PMID: 39188736 PMC: 11235784. DOI: 10.1002/SMMD.20220021.

A surgical activity model of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for co-operation with collaborative robots.

Younis R, Yamlahi A, Bodenstedt S, Scheikl P, Kisilenko A, Daum M Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4316-4328.

PMID: 38872018 PMC: 11289174. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10958-w.

Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy.

Connor M, Gorin M, Eldred-Evans D, Bass E, Desai A, Dudderidge T Nat Rev Urol. 2023; 20(4):241-258.

PMID: 36653670 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00684-0.

COVID-19 and public support for autonomous technologies-Did the pandemic catalyze a world of robots?.

Horowitz M, Kahn L, MacDonald J, Schneider J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0273941.

PMID: 36170283 PMC: 9518891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273941.

References

Khadhouri S, Miller C, Fowler S, Hounsome L, McNeill A, Adshead J . The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) radical prostatectomy audit 2014/2015 - an update on current practice and outcomes by centre and surgeon case-volume. BJU Int. 2018; 121(6):886-892. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14156. View

Rassweiler J, Autorino R, Klein J, Mottrie A, Goezen A, Stolzenburg J . Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2017; 120(6):822-841. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13851. View

Gilling P, Reuther R, Kahokehr A, Fraundorfer M . Aquablation - image-guided robot-assisted waterjet ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. BJU Int. 2015; 117(6):923-9. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13358. View

Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T . WATER: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aquablation vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2018; 199(5):1252-1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065. View

Shademan A, Decker R, Opfermann J, Leonard S, Krieger A, Kim P . Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8(337):337ra64. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9398. View

Harris S, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, Hibberd R, Davies B, WICKHAM J . The Probot--an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997; 211(4):317-25. DOI: 10.1243/0954411971534449. View

Cornu J, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C . A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(6):1066-1096. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. View

Faber K, de Abreu A, Ramos P, Aljuri N, Mantri S, Gill I . Image-guided robot-assisted prostate ablation using water jet-hydrodissection: initial study of a novel technology for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2014; 29(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0304. View

Desai M, Bidair M, Bhojani N, Trainer A, Arther A, Kramolowsky E . WATER II (80-150 mL) procedural outcomes. BJU Int. 2018; 123(1):106-112. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14360. View

10.

Podder T, Beaulieu L, Caldwell B, Cormack R, Crass J, Dicker A . AAPM and GEC-ESTRO guidelines for image-guided robotic brachytherapy: report of Task Group 192. Med Phys. 2014; 41(10):101501. DOI: 10.1118/1.4895013. View

11.

Patriciu A, Petrisor D, Muntener M, Mazilu D, Schar M, Stoianovici D . Automatic brachytherapy seed placement under MRI guidance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007; 54(8):1499-506. PMC: 3099459. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.900816. View

12.

Muntener M, Patriciu A, Petrisor D, Mazilu D, Bagga H, Kavoussi L . Magnetic resonance imaging compatible robotic system for fully automated brachytherapy seed placement. Urology. 2006; 68(6):1313-7. PMC: 3100553. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1089. View

13.

Caugant D, Zollinger W, Mocca L, Frasch C, Whittam T, Froholm L . Genetic relationships and clonal population structure of serotype 2 strains of Neisseria meningitidis. Infect Immun. 1987; 55(6):1503-12. PMC: 260543. DOI: 10.1128/iai.55.6.1503-1512.1987. View

14.

Popescu T, Kacso A, Pisla D, Kacso G . Brachytherapy next generation: robotic systems. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016; 7(6):510-4. PMC: 4716136. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.56769. View

15.

Shah T, Peters M, Eldred-Evans D, Miah S, Yap T, Faure-Walker N . Early-Medium-Term Outcomes of Primary Focal Cryotherapy to Treat Nonmetastatic Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer from a Prospective Multicentre Registry. Eur Urol. 2019; 76(1):98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.030. View

16.

Catto J, Khetrapal P, Ambler G, Sarpong R, Khan M, Tan M . Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(8):e020500. PMC: 6089318. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020500. View

17.

Chang K, Abdel Raheem A, Choi Y, Chung B, Rha K . Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial. BJU Int. 2018; 122(3):441-448. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14245. View

18.

Gagnon L, Goldenberg S, Lynch K, Hurtado A, Gleave M . Comparison of open and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The University of British Columbia experience. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014; 8(3-4):92-7. PMC: 4001645. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1707. View

19.

Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Bjorholt I, Carlsson S . Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol. 2018; 74(6):816-824. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038. View

20.

Lee N . Robotic surgery: where are we now?. Lancet. 2014; 384(9952):1417. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61851-1. View