» Articles » PMID: 35080901

Autonomous Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery for Intestinal Anastomosis

Overview
Journal Sci Robot
Date 2022 Jan 26
PMID 35080901
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Autonomous robotic surgery has the potential to provide efficacy, safety, and consistency independent of individual surgeon's skill and experience. Autonomous anastomosis is a challenging soft-tissue surgery task because it requires intricate imaging, tissue tracking, and surgical planning techniques, as well as a precise execution via highly adaptable control strategies often in unstructured and deformable environments. In the laparoscopic setting, such surgeries are even more challenging because of the need for high maneuverability and repeatability under motion and vision constraints. Here we describe an enhanced autonomous strategy for laparoscopic soft tissue surgery and demonstrate robotic laparoscopic small bowel anastomosis in phantom and in vivo intestinal tissues. This enhanced autonomous strategy allows the operator to select among autonomously generated surgical plans and the robot executes a wide range of tasks independently. We then use our enhanced autonomous strategy to perform in vivo autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis on porcine models over a 1-week survival period. We compared the anastomosis quality criteria-including needle placement corrections, suture spacing, suture bite size, completion time, lumen patency, and leak pressure-of the developed autonomous system, manual laparoscopic surgery, and robot-assisted surgery (RAS). Data from a phantom model indicate that our system outperforms expert surgeons' manual technique and RAS technique in terms of consistency and accuracy. This was also replicated in the in vivo model. These results demonstrate that surgical robots exhibiting high levels of autonomy have the potential to improve consistency, patient outcomes, and access to a standard surgical technique.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence in surgery: a systematic review and perspectives.

Chevalier O, Dubey G, Benkabbou A, Majbar M, Souadka A Pflugers Arch. 2025; .

PMID: 40087157 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-025-03076-6.


Robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative insights into perioperative performance and three-year survival outcomes.

Ushimaru Y, Omori T, Yamamoto K, Yanagimoto Y, Masuike Y, Matsuura N Gastric Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40009253 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01601-1.


Robot-Based Procedure for 3D Reconstruction of Abdominal Organs Using the Iterative Closest Point and Pose Graph Algorithms.

Gobel B, Huurdeman J, Reiterer A, Moller K J Imaging. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997546 PMC: 11856341. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11020044.


ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery.

Garnier J, Wolfgang C, Hewitt D Ann Surg Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39994166 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17061-x.


Robotic Laser Tissue Soldering for Atraumatic Soft Tissue Fusion Guided by Fluorescent Nanothermometry.

Cipolato O, Leuthold T, Zach M, Mannel G, Aegerter S, Sciascia C Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(7):e2406671.

PMID: 39569684 PMC: 11831491. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202406671.


References
1.
Marecik S, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl R, Park J, Prasad L . A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg. 2007; 193(3):349-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.018. View

2.
Rose P, Nusbaum B . Robotic hair restoration. Dermatol Clin. 2013; 32(1):97-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2013.09.008. View

3.
Williams C, Rosen M, Jin J, McGee M, Schomisch S, Ponsky J . Objective analysis of the accuracy and efficacy of a novel fascial closure device. Surg Innov. 2008; 15(4):307-11. DOI: 10.1177/1553350608327168. View

4.
Hu D, Gong Y, Seibel E, Sekhar L, Hannaford B . Semi-autonomous image-guided brain tumour resection using an integrated robotic system: A bench-top study. Int J Med Robot. 2017; 14(1). PMC: 5762424. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1872. View

5.
Hennersperger C, Fuerst B, Virga S, Zettinig O, Frisch B, Neff T . Towards MRI-Based Autonomous Robotic US Acquisitions: A First Feasibility Study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 36(2):538-548. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2620723. View