» Articles » PMID: 32948815

Biogeochemical Water Type Influences Community Composition, Species Richness, and Biomass in Megadiverse Amazonian Fish Assemblages

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Sep 19
PMID 32948815
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Amazonian waters are classified into three biogeochemical categories by dissolved nutrient content, sediment type, transparency, and acidity-all important predictors of autochthonous and allochthonous primary production (PP): (1) nutrient-poor, low-sediment, high-transparency, humic-stained, acidic blackwaters; (2) nutrient-poor, low-sediment, high-transparency, neutral clearwaters; (3) nutrient-rich, low-transparency, alluvial sediment-laden, neutral whitewaters. The classification, first proposed by Alfred Russel Wallace in 1853, is well supported but its effects on fish are poorly understood. To investigate how Amazonian fish community composition and species richness are influenced by water type, we conducted quantitative year-round sampling of floodplain lake and river-margin habitats at a locality where all three water types co-occur. We sampled 22,398 fish from 310 species. Community composition was influenced more by water type than habitat. Whitewater communities were distinct from those of blackwaters and clearwaters, with community structure correlated strongly to conductivity and turbidity. Mean per-sampling event species richness and biomass were significantly higher in nutrient-rich whitewater floodplain lakes than in oligotrophic blackwater and clearwater river-floodplain systems and light-limited whitewater rivers. Our study provides novel insights into the influences of biogeochemical water type and ecosystem productivity on Earth's most diverse aquatic vertebrate fauna and highlights the importance of including multiple water types in conservation planning.

Citing Articles

Low Genetic Diversity and Complex Population Structure in Black Piranha (), a Key Amazonian Predator.

Thomas A, Sylvain F, Normandeau E, Leroux N, Holland A, Val A Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70824.

PMID: 39963508 PMC: 11831006. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70824.


Floodplain forests drive fruit-eating fish diversity at the Amazon Basin-scale.

Correa S, Coronado-Franco K, Jezequel C, Cantarute Rodrigues A, Evans K, Granger J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(3):e2414416122.

PMID: 39805021 PMC: 11761662. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2414416122.


Integrative use of DNA barcode and morphology reveal high level of diversity in the ornamental fish on the lower Amazon basin.

de Freitas E, Dos Santos D, Moraes Ferreira C, Silva-Oliveira C, Evangelista-Gomes G, Veneza I PLoS One. 2025; 19(12):e0316455.

PMID: 39775746 PMC: 11684679. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316455.


Ethnoecology and use of fishes by the Cubeo people from the Cuduyarí River, Colombian Amazonia.

Bogota-Gregory J, Jaramillo Hurtado L, Guhl Samudio J, Agudelo Cordoba E J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024; 20(1):101.

PMID: 39574187 PMC: 11583506. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-024-00737-1.


Alfred Russel Wallace's legacy: an interdisciplinary conception of evolution in space and time.

Hortal J, Diniz-Filho J, Low M, Stigall A, Yeo D NPJ Biodivers. 2024; 2(1):3.

PMID: 39242888 PMC: 11331985. DOI: 10.1038/s44185-023-00010-w.


References
1.
Reis R, Albert J, Di Dario F, Mincarone M, Petry P, Rocha L . Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol. 2016; 89(1):12-47. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13016. View

2.
Fernandes C, Podos J, Lundberg J . Amazonian ecology: tributaries enhance the diversity of electric fishes. Science. 2004; 305(5692):1960-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1101240. View

3.
Willis S, Winemiller K, Lopez-Fernandez H . Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia. 2005; 142(2):284-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1723-z. View

4.
Rodriguez M, Lewis Jr W . Regulation and stability in fish assemblages of neotropical floodplain lakes. Oecologia. 2017; 99(1-2):166-180. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317098. View

5.
Etienne R, Olff H . Confronting different models of community structure to species-abundance data: a Bayesian model comparison. Ecol Lett. 2011; 8(5):493-504. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00745.x. View