Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim in Elderly Patients with Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL): Results of the Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority AVOID Neutropenia Study
Overview
Oncology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Lipegfilgrastim has been shown to be non-inferior to pegfilgrastim for reduction of the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in breast cancer patients. This open-label, non-inferiority study assessed the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in elderly patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) at high risk for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Patient And Methods: One hundred and one patients (median age, 75 years) were randomized to lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim (6 mg/cycle) during six cycles of R-CHOP21.
Results: Lipegfilgrastim was non-inferior to pegfilgrastim for the primary efficacy endpoint, reduction of DSN in cycle 1. In the per-protocol population, mean (standard deviation) DSN was 0.8 (0.92) and 0.9 (1.11) days in the two groups, respectively; the adjusted mean difference between groups was - 0.3 days (95% confidence interval, - 0.70 to 0.19). Non-inferiority was also demonstrated in the intent-to-treat population. The incidence of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 51% (21/41) in the lipegfilgrastim group and 52% (23/44) in the pegfilgrastim group. Very severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.1 × 10/L) in cycle 1 was reported by 5 (12%) patients in the lipegfilgrastim group and 8 (18%) patients in the pegfilgrastim group. However, over all cycles, febrile neutropenia (strict definition) was reported by only 1 (2%) patient in each treatment group (during cycle 1 in the lipegfilgrastim group and cycle 6 in the pegfilgrastim group). The mean time to absolute neutrophil count recovery (defined as ≥ 2.0 × 10/L) was 8.3 and 9.4 days in the two groups, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 46% of patients in each group; none were considered treatment-related. Eight patients died during the study (2 in the lipegfilgrastim group, 5 in the pegfilgrastim group, and 1 who died before starting study treatment). No deaths occurred during the treatment period, and all were considered to be related to the underlying disease.
Conclusions: This study shows lipegfilgrastim to be non-inferior to pegfilgrastim for the reduction of DSN in elderly patients with aggressive B cell NHL receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, with a comparable safety profile.
Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02044276; EudraCT number 2013-001284-23.
New insight into strategies used to develop long-acting G-CSF biologics for neutropenia therapy.
Theyab A, Alsharif K, Alzahrani K, Oyouni A, Hawsawi Y, Algahtani M Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1026377.
PMID: 36686781 PMC: 9850083. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1026377.
Link H, Thompson S, Tian M, Haas J, Meise D, Maas C Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(11):9317-9327.
PMID: 36076105 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07353-3.
A multinational, drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim use in real-world setting in Europe.
Kaplan S, Bogojevic D, Rainville C, Gross N Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(11):9191-9201.
PMID: 36044089 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07341-7.
Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).
Link H Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(9):7067-7077.
PMID: 35739328 PMC: 9225876. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07103-5.