» Articles » PMID: 23945072

Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim: a Randomized, Multicenter, Active-control Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Doxorubicin/docetaxel Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Aug 16
PMID 23945072
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy.

Methods: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 109 cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1.

Results: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (λ = -0.218 [95% confidence interval: -0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Trial Registration: Eudra EEACTA200901599910.

Citing Articles

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of pegylated PEG-rhg-CSF in pediatric patients receiving high-intensity chemotherapy: results from a phase II study.

Huang J, Zhu J, Jiang L, Xu J, Lin X, Chang J Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1419369.

PMID: 39086394 PMC: 11288831. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1419369.


Efbemalenograstim alfa not inferior to pegfilgrastim in providing neutrophil support in women with breast cancer undergoing myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a phase 2 randomized, multicenter, open-label trial.

Glaspy J, Bondarenko I, Krasnozhon D, Rutty D, Chen J, Fu Y Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(2):91.

PMID: 38194162 PMC: 10776461. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08260-x.


Efbemalenograstim alfa, an Fc fusion protein, long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for reducing the risk of febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy: results of a phase III trial.

Glaspy J, Bondarenko I, Burdaeva O, Chen J, Rutty D, Li R Support Care Cancer. 2023; 32(1):34.

PMID: 38103088 PMC: 10725375. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08176-6.


Improving the Therapeutic Potential of G-CSF through Compact Circular PEGylation Based on Orthogonal Conjugations.

Grigoletto A, Marotti V, Tedeschini T, Campara B, Marigo I, Ingangi V Biomacromolecules. 2023; 24(9):4229-4239.

PMID: 37638739 PMC: 10498445. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00543.


Assessing the Optimal Regimen: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer.

You Z, Zhang H, Huang Y, Zhao L, Tu H, Zhang Y Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(14).

PMID: 37509336 PMC: 10378237. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143675.


References
1.
Kuderer N, Dale D, Crawford J, Lyman G . Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(21):3158-67. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8823. View

2.
Crawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R, Johnson D, Lyman G, Tabbara I . Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(3):164-70. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199107183250305. View

3.
Freifeld A, Bow E, Sepkowitz K, Boeckh M, Ito J, Mullen C . Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(4):427-31. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq147. View

4.
Pizzo P . Management of fever in patients with cancer and treatment-induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(18):1323-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199305063281808. View

5.
Vogel C, Wojtukiewicz M, Carroll R, Tjulandin S, Barajas-Figueroa L, Wiens B . First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(6):1178-84. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.102. View