» Articles » PMID: 32943812

E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 18
PMID 32943812
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

E-cigarettes provide nicotine in a vapor form, which is considered less harmful than the smoke from combustible cigarettes because it does not contain the toxins that are found in tobacco smoke. E-cigarettes may be effective in helping smokers to quit or they might simply provide smokers a method of bypassing smoking restrictions. There is very little causal evidence to date on how e-cigarette use impacts smoking cessation among adults. Minnesota was the first to impose a tax on e-cigarettes. This tax provides a plausibly exogenous deterrent to e-cigarette use. We utilize data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplements from 1992 to 2015 to assess how the Minnesota tax increase impacted smoking cessation among adult smokers. Estimates suggest that the e-cigarette tax increased adult smoking and reduced smoking cessation in Minnesota, relative to the control group, and imply a cross elasticity of current smoking participation with respect to e-cigarette prices of 0.13. Our results suggest that in the sample period about 32,400 additional adult smokers would have quit smoking in Minnesota in the absence of the tax. If this tax were imposed on a national level about 1.8 million smokers would be deterred from quitting in a ten year period. The taxation of e-cigarettes at the same rate as cigarettes could deter more than 2.75 million smokers nationally from quitting in the same period. The public health benefits of not taxing e-cigarettes, however, must be weighed against effects of this decision on efforts to reduce vaping by youth.

Citing Articles

Smokeless tobacco excise taxes in the US: Standardizing the measurement for empirical analysis.

He Y, Zhang Z, Yang Q, Shang C Prev Med Rep. 2025; 50:102979.

PMID: 39927129 PMC: 11803860. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102979.


A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.

Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.

PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.


The Effect of E-Cigarette Indoor Vaping Restrictions on Infant Mortality.

Cooper M, Pesko M South Econ J. 2024; 91(1):278-321.

PMID: 39130090 PMC: 11313160. DOI: 10.1002/soej.12564.


The effect of e-cigarette taxes on prepregnancy and prenatal smoking.

Abouk R, Adams S, Feng B, Maclean J, Pesko M J Policy Anal Manage. 2024; 42(4):908-940.

PMID: 38313828 PMC: 10836838. DOI: 10.1002/pam.22485.


How do users compare the costs between nicotine vaping products and cigarettes? Findings from the 2016-2020 International Tobacco Control United States surveys.

He Y, Liber A, Driezen P, Thompson M, Levy D, Fong G Addiction. 2024; 119(5):885-897.

PMID: 38186201 PMC: 11009094. DOI: 10.1111/add.16425.


References
1.
Zhu S, Zhuang Y, Wong S, Cummins S, Tedeschi G . E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys. BMJ. 2017; 358:j3262. PMC: 5526046. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3262. View

2.
Czogala J, Goniewicz M, Fidelus B, Zielinska-Danch W, Travers M, Sobczak A . Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 16(6):655-62. PMC: 4565991. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt203. View

3.
Goniewicz M, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J . Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2013; 23(2):133-9. PMC: 4154473. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859. View

4.
Babb S, Malarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A . Quitting Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017; 65(52):1457-1464. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1. View

5.
Stearns J . The effects of paid maternity leave: Evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance. J Health Econ. 2015; 43:85-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.04.005. View