» Articles » PMID: 32908400

Serovars and Vaccination Effect on the Immune Responses of Male and Female Layers

Overview
Journal J Poult Sci
Date 2020 Sep 10
PMID 32908400
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enteritidis, Gallinarum and Pullorum are common serovars to infect poultry and cause diseases differently. The antibody production and cellular immune responses of male and female layers were evaluated before and after inoculation. Before inoculation, Gallinarum and Pullorum could survive and grow in 10% sera from 6-week-old layers, and Enteritidis and were completely eliminated. The weights of the male and female layers were increased the lowest by inoculation with Gallinarum, followed by Pullorum, and Enteritidis. Inoculation with Enteritidis, Gallinarum and Pullorum increased the antibody titer in the males depending on the serovars and maintained same higher antibody level in females. Furthermore, an increased anti- IgG titer was associated with bactericidal ability and the level was reduced by serovars and complemente. Despite the vaccination and serovars, the male layers expressed more IgG2a than IgG1, indicating preferential activation of the Th1 pathway. The inoculation number affected the expression level of IFN- and IL-12 in the blood not in the secretion of the peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs) and more inoculations increased the expression of both cytokines. Inoculation increased more reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells, not the PBMCs. ROS production was greater in cells from the males than from the females and greater in the cells treated with Enteritidis than Gallinarum and Pullorum. These three serovars and their vaccinations differed in sera killing and immune responses.

References
1.
Anastasiadou M, Avdi M, Theodoridis A, Michailidis G . Temporal changes in the expression of avian β-defensins in the chicken vagina during sexual maturation and Salmonella infection. Vet Res Commun. 2013; 37(2):115-22. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-013-9553-2. View

2.
MacLennan C, Gondwe E, Msefula C, Kingsley R, Thomson N, White S . The neglected role of antibody in protection against bacteremia caused by nontyphoidal strains of Salmonella in African children. J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(4):1553-62. PMC: 2268878. DOI: 10.1172/JCI33998. View

3.
Matulova M, Varmuzova K, Sisak F, Havlickova H, Babak V, Stejskal K . Chicken innate immune response to oral infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vet Res. 2013; 44:37. PMC: 3663788. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-37. View

4.
Chu C, Wong D, Wang M, Lin H, Chen Y, Tien N . Genotyping, plasmid analysis, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates from humans and chickens in central Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2009; 108(10):765-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60403-4. View

5.
Mastroeni P, Villarreal-Ramos B, Hormaeche C . Adoptive transfer of immunity to oral challenge with virulent salmonellae in innately susceptible BALB/c mice requires both immune serum and T cells. Infect Immun. 1993; 61(9):3981-4. PMC: 281103. DOI: 10.1128/iai.61.9.3981-3984.1993. View