» Articles » PMID: 32885328

Assessment of Intraoperative Use of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging on the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32885328
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current data on the intraoperative use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to reduce the anastomotic leak (AL) rate in rectal cancer surgery remain controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ICG fluorescence imaging in decreasing the AL rate after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods: Studies comparing ICG fluorescence imaging with standard care in patients with rectal cancer were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library through January 2020. The current meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the baseline features, AL rate and other surgical outcomes. RevMan version 5.3 software was used for the present meta-analysis.

Results: Nine studies with a total of 2088 patients with rectal cancer (926 in the ICG group and 1162 in the control group) were included in the present study. In the pooled analysis, the available patient and tumour-related baseline data were all comparable and without significant heterogeneity. In the present pooled analysis, the AL rate in the ICG group was significantly lower (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.22-0.52; p < 0.0001) than that in the control group. Additionally, intraoperative use of ICG was associated with a decreased overall complication rate (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.42-0.78; p = 0.0003) and reduced reoperation rate (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.86; p = 0.03) in patients who had rectal cancer surgery.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated the superiority of the intraoperative use of ICG in reducing the AL rate. However, considering the limitations of the included studies, more high-quality prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are needed.

Citing Articles

Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery in the emergency setting: the WSES international consensus position paper.

De Simone B, Abu-Zidan F, Boni L, Castillo A, Cassinotti E, Corradi F World J Emerg Surg. 2025; 20(1):13.

PMID: 39948641 PMC: 11823064. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00575-w.


Peritoneal fluid indocyanine green test for diagnosis of gut leakage in anastomotic leakage rats and colorectal surgery patients.

Huang Y, Li T, Weng J, Liu H, Xu Y, Zhang S World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(6):1825-1834.

PMID: 38983318 PMC: 11230036. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1825.


NIR ICG-Enhanced Fluorescence: A Quantitative Evaluation of Bowel Microperfusion and Its Relation to Central Perfusion in Colorectal Surgery.

Depalma N, DUgo S, Manoochehri F, Libia A, Sergi W, Marchese T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(23).

PMID: 38067233 PMC: 10705733. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235528.


Current applications of indocyanine green (ICG) in abdominal, gynecologic and urologic surgery: a meta-review and quality analysis with use of the AMSTAR 2 instrument.

Pantelis A, Machairiotis N, Stavros S, Disu S, Drakakis P Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(2):511-528.

PMID: 37957300 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10546-4.


Fluorescent ICG angiography in laparoscopic rectal resection - a randomized controlled trial. Preliminary report.

Gach T, Bogacki P, Orzeszko Z, Markowska B, Krzak J, Szura M Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(3):410-417.

PMID: 37868286 PMC: 10585458. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.129545.


References
1.
Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y, Gao X, Patkar A . The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18(6):1176-85. PMC: 4028541. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4. View

2.
Kingham T, Pachter H . Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208(2):269-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015. View

3.
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R . Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(2):207-14. PMC: 1933561. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024. View

4.
Chadi S, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester S, Fleshman J, Hyman N . Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20(12):2035-2051. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3255-3. View

5.
Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Luis Ramos Rodriguez J, Granero-Castro P, Hervas D, Alvarez Rico M . Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection for Cancer: Multivariate Analysis and Nomogram From a Multicentric, Prospective, National Study With 3193 Patients. Ann Surg. 2014; 262(2):321-30. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973. View