» Articles » PMID: 17667498

Defunctioning Stoma Reduces Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum for Cancer: a Randomized Multicenter Trial

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2007 Aug 2
PMID 17667498
Citations 367
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this randomized multicenter trial was to assess the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage in patients operated on with low anterior resection for rectal cancer and who were intraoperatively randomized to a defunctioning stoma or not.

Summary Background Data: The introduction of total mesorectal excision surgery as the surgical technique of choice for carcinoma in the lower and mid rectum has led to decreased local recurrence and improved oncological results. Despite these advances, perioperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. The role of the defunctioning stoma in regard to anastomotic leakage is controversial and has not been assessed in any randomized trial of sufficient size.

Methods: From December 1999 to June 2005, a total of 234 patients were randomized to a defunctioning loop stoma or no loop stoma. Loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy was at the choice of the surgeon. Inclusion criteria for randomization were expected survival >6 months, informed consent, anastomosis < or =7 cm above the anal verge, negative air leakage test, intact anastomotic rings, and absence of major intraoperative adverse events.

Results: The overall rate of symptomatic leakage was 19.2% (45 of 234). Patients randomized to a defunctioning stoma (n = 116) had leakage in 10.3% (12 of 116) and those without stoma (n = 118) in 28.0% (33 of 118) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.9; P < 0.001). The need for urgent abdominal reoperation was 8.6% (10 of 116) in those randomized to stoma and 25.4% (30 of 118) in those without (P < 0.001). After a follow-up of median 42 months (range, 6-72 months), 13.8% (16 of 116) of the initially defunctioned patients still had a stoma of any kind, compared with 16.9% (20 of 118) those not defunctioned (not significant). The 30-day mortality after anterior resection was 0.4% (1 of 234) and after elective reversal a defunctioning stoma 0.9% (1 of 111). Median age was 68 years (range, 32-86 years), 45.3% (106 of 234) were females, 79.1% (185 of 234) had preoperative radiotherapy, the level of anastomosis was median 5 cm, and intraoperative blood loss 550 mL, without differences between the groups.

Conclusion: Defunctioning loop stoma decreased the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and is therefore recommended in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.

Doniz Gomez Llanos D, Leal Hidalgo C, Arechavala Lopez S, Padilla Flores A, Correa Rovelo J, Athie Athie A Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e79647.

PMID: 40008105 PMC: 11857925. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79647.


Increased risk of postoperative complications after delayed stoma reversal: a multicenter retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Munshi E, Segelman J, Matthiessen P, Park J, Rutegard M, Sjostrom O Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40(1):36.

PMID: 39939486 PMC: 11821667. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-04831-y.


Comparison of the C-REX LapAid and Circular Stapled Colorectal Anastomoses in an Experimental Model.

Vilhjalmsson D, Gronberg A, Syk I, Thorlacius H Eur Surg Res. 2025; 66(1):9-17.

PMID: 39933492 PMC: 11892461. DOI: 10.1159/000543069.


Long-term bowel function following delayed coloanal anastomosis: Analysis of a multicentric cohort study (GRECCAR).

Collard M, Tuech J, Sabbagh C, Souadka A, Loriau J, Rullier E Colorectal Dis. 2025; 27(2):e70013.

PMID: 39905658 PMC: 11794976. DOI: 10.1111/codi.70013.


SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA): Protocol for a prospective study with a nested randomized clinical trial investigating stoma-free survival without major LARS following total mesorectal....

Rutegard M, Lindskold M, Jorgren F, Landerholm K, Matthiessen P, Forsmo H Colorectal Dis. 2025; 27(2):e70009.

PMID: 39887540 PMC: 11780343. DOI: 10.1111/codi.70009.


References
1.
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R . Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2004; 6(6):462-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x. View

2.
BRUCE J, Krukowski Z, Russell E, Park K . Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001; 88(9):1157-68. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x. View

3.
Eriksen M, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig J . Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis. 2004; 7(1):51-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x. View

4.
Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon J, Parneix M, Saric J . Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2001; 25(3):274-7; discussion 277-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002680020091. View

5.
Pahlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Lindmark G, Sjodahl R . The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(10):1285-92. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5679. View