» Articles » PMID: 32876924

Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?

Abstract

This review searched for published evidence that could explain how different physicochemical properties impact on the allergenicity of food proteins and if their effects would follow specific patterns among distinct protein families. Owing to the amount and complexity of the collected information, this literature overview was divided in two articles, the current one dedicated to protein families of plant allergens and a second one focused on animal allergens. Our extensive analysis of the available literature revealed that physicochemical characteristics had consistent effects on protein allergenicity for allergens belonging to the same protein family. For example, protein aggregation contributes to increased allergenicity of 2S albumins, while for legumins and cereal prolamins, the same phenomenon leads to a reduction. Molecular stability, related to structural resistance to heat and proteolysis, was identified as the most common feature promoting plant protein allergenicity, although it fails to explain the potency of some unstable allergens (e.g. pollen-related food allergens). Furthermore, data on physicochemical characteristics translating into clinical effects are limited, mainly because most studies are focused on in vitro IgE binding. Clinical data assessing how these parameters affect the development and clinical manifestation of allergies is minimal, with only few reports evaluating the sensitising capacity of modified proteins (addressing different physicochemical properties) in murine allergy models. In vivo testing of modified pure proteins by SPT or DBPCFC is scarce. At this stage, a systematic approach to link the physicochemical properties with clinical plant allergenicity in real-life scenarios is still missing.

Citing Articles

Update on hazelnut allergy: Allergen characterization, epidemiology, food processing technique and detecting strategy.

Camus-Ela M, Wang Y, Rennie G, Raghavan V, Wang J Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025; 24(2):e70098.

PMID: 39898897 PMC: 11789833. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.70098.


Impact of Heat and Pressure Processing Treatments on the Digestibility of Peanut, Hazelnut, Pistachio and Cashew Allergens.

Arribas C, Sanchiz A, Pedrosa M, Perez-Garcia S, Linacero R, Cuadrado C Foods. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39593965 PMC: 11593142. DOI: 10.3390/foods13223549.


Identification of potential antigenic proteins and epitopes for the development of a monkeypox virus vaccine: an in silico approach.

Aktas E, Sezerman O, Ozer M, Kirboga K, Koseoglu A, Ozgenturk N Mol Divers. 2024; .

PMID: 39546220 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-024-11033-1.


Can Physicochemical Properties Alter the Potency of Aeroallergens? Part 2 - Impact of Physicochemical Properties.

Teixeira C, Carrico-Sa B, Villa C, Mafra I, Costa J Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024; 24(11):609-617.

PMID: 39302572 PMC: 11481639. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01173-7.


Can Physicochemical Properties Alter the Potency of Aeroallergens? Part 1 - Aeroallergen Protein Families.

Teixeira C, Carrico-Sa B, Villa C, Mafra I, Costa J Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024; 24(11):591-607.

PMID: 39302571 PMC: 11464574. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01172-8.


References
1.
AAS K . What makes an allergen an allergen. Allergy. 1978; 33(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1978.tb01501.x. View

2.
Verhoeckx K, Vissers Y, Baumert J, Faludi R, Feys M, Flanagan S . Food processing and allergenicity. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015; 80:223-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.03.005. View

3.
Matricardi P, Kleine-Tebbe J, Hoffmann H, Valenta R, Hilger C, Hofmaier S . EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016; 27 Suppl 23:1-250. DOI: 10.1111/pai.12563. View

4.
Scheurer S, Toda M, Vieths S . What makes an allergen?. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015; 45(7):1150-61. DOI: 10.1111/cea.12571. View

5.
Radauer C, Bublin M, Wagner S, Mari A, Breiteneder H . Allergens are distributed into few protein families and possess a restricted number of biochemical functions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121(4):847-52.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.025. View