» Articles » PMID: 32876737

Laparoscopic Skills Training: the Effects of Viewing Mode (2D Vs. 3D) on Skill Acquisition and Transfer

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Sep 3
PMID 32876737
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) visual displays have been suggested to aid laparoscopic skills training by providing the depth cues not present in traditional two-dimensional (2D) displays. However, few studies have robustly investigated the impact of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on learning outcomes.

Purpose: To examine how viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) impacts the acquisition and transferability of basic laparoscopic skills by comparing performance between transfer and control groups on a complete proficiency-based training program.

Method: A counterbalanced between-subjects design was employed. Each participant was randomly allocated to one of four groups, comprising two transfer groups (trained in one viewing mode and tested in the alternate mode: the 2D → 3D and 3D → 2D groups) and two control groups (trained and tested in one viewing mode: the 2D → 2D and 3D → 3D groups). Participants completed proficiency-based training in six laparoscopic training tasks. Testing included two further repetitions of all tasks under test conditions. Objective performance measures included the total number of repetitions to reach proficiency, and total performance scores (i.e. time + error penalties across all repetitions) in training and testing.

Results: The groups trained in 3D demonstrated superior training performance (i.e. less time + errors) and took fewer repetitions to reach proficiency than the groups trained in 2D. The groups tested in 3D also demonstrated superior test performance compared to those tested in 2D. However, training mode did not yield significant test differences between the groups tested in 2D (i.e. 2D → 2D vs. 3D → 2D), or between the groups tested in 3D (i.e. 3D → 3D vs. 2D → 3D).

Conclusion: Novices demonstrate superior performance in laparoscopic skills training using a 3D viewing mode compared to 2D. However, this does not necessarily translate to superior performance in subsequent testing or enhanced learning overall. Rather, test performance appears to be dictated by the viewing mode used during testing, not that of prior training.

Citing Articles

Current status, challenges, and future directions of laparoscopic training in young surgeons: a nationwide survey in China.

Li T, Wu H, Dong J BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1040.

PMID: 39334031 PMC: 11429501. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06031-8.


Sensorimotor Challenges in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Theoretically-Oriented Review.

Hewitson C, Crossley M, Cartmill J, Kaplan D Hum Factors. 2024; 67(2):141-165.

PMID: 39038166 PMC: 11626857. DOI: 10.1177/00187208241263684.


Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study.

Bhattacharjee H, Yadav S, Mishra A, Suhani S, Joshi M, Parshad R Updates Surg. 2024; 76(6):2461-2470.

PMID: 38507178 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7.


Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

Sauve J, Wu Y, Ghatanatti R, Zacharias J J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(3).

PMID: 36975882 PMC: 10051570. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10030118.


Safety of Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kowalczyk D, Piatkowski S, Porazko M, Woskowska A, Szewczyk K, Brudniak K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36361054 PMC: 9654606. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114163.


References
1.
Yeudall L, Reddon J, Gill D, Stefanyk W . Normative data for the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological tests stratified by age and sex. J Clin Psychol. 1987; 43(3):346-67. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198705)43:3<346::aid-jclp2270430308>3.0.co;2-q. View

2.
Moore M, Bennett C . The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg. 1995; 170(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80252-9. View

3.
Virgili G, Acosta R, Bentley S, Giacomelli G, Allcock C, Evans J . Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 4:CD003303. PMC: 6494537. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4. View

4.
Kelly A, Townsend K, Davis S, Nouryan L, Bostrom M, Felix K . Comparative Assessment of Grit, Conscientiousness, and Self-Control in Applicants Interviewing for Residency Positions and Current Orthopaedic Surgery Residents. J Surg Educ. 2017; 75(3):557-563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.002. View

5.
Nomura T, Matsutani T, Hagiwara N, Fujita I, Nakamura Y, Kanazawa Y . Characteristics predicting laparoscopic skill in medical students: nine years' experience in a single center. Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5643-5. View