» Articles » PMID: 32872206

Factors That Influence Farmers' Views on Farm Animal Welfare: A Semi-Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2020 Sep 3
PMID 32872206
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Farm animal welfare (FAW) is a growing societal concern, reflected by over 30 years of research to inform policy and practice. Despite the wealth of evidence to improve FAW, implementation of good practice continues to be an issue. The role of the stakeholder, particularly farmers, is pivotal to FAW improvement. This semi-systematic review synthesizes the evidence published in the last 30 years, worldwide, to address two main questions "what do farmers think (farmer's general view) about farm animal welfare?" and "what are the factors that influence their thinking?". A thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that influenced the implementation of FAW innovation. The main outcomes extracted from 96 peer-reviewed publications on a range of livestock species identified 11 internal factors including farmer knowledge, empathy, personality, values, and human-animal bond; 15 external factors including economic advantages, communication, time and labor influenced the perception of FAW. Farmers' knowledge and cost implications of FAW were the most frequently reported factors. The review further highlights the need for promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder participation. This study suggests strategies to improve FAW, including tools to support behavioral changes amongst farmers.

Citing Articles

The Cow Paradox-A Scoping Review of Dairy Bovine Welfare in India Using the Five Freedoms.

Mathkari C Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943224 PMC: 11816332. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030454.


From Naturalness to Environmental Control: Influences of Transitioning Production Systems on Dairy Farmers' Perceptions of Cow Welfare.

Nogueira L, Hotzel M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518786 PMC: 11544898. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213063.


Animal welfare with Chinese characteristics: Chinese poultry producers' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, animal welfare.

Yang Q, Dwyer C, Vigors B, Zhao R, Langford F PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307061.

PMID: 39024229 PMC: 11257329. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307061.


Support for the 'Pets as Ambassadors' hypothesis in men: Higher animal empathy in Australian pet-owners vs non-owners and farmers.

Frampton G, Oliva J Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e23.

PMID: 38721623 PMC: 11076914. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.25.


Cohort profile: The FarmMERGE project-Merging human and animal databases to investigate the relationship between farmer and livestock health and welfare. The HUNT Study.

Torske M, Steen N, Ursin J, Krokstad S, Norstebo H, Muri K PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0301045.

PMID: 38547183 PMC: 10977672. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301045.


References
1.
Hansson H, Lagerkvist C, Azar G . Use and non-use values as motivational construct dimensions for farm animal welfare: impacts on the economic outcome for the farm. Animal. 2018; 12(10):2147-2155. DOI: 10.1017/S175173111700372X. View

2.
Hansen B, Osteras O . Farmer welfare and animal welfare- Exploring the relationship between farmer's occupational well-being and stress, farm expansion and animal welfare. Prev Vet Med. 2019; 170:104741. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104741. View

3.
Dutton-Regester K, Wright J, Rabiee A, Barnes T . Understanding dairy farmer intentions to make improvements to their management practices of foot lesions causing lameness in dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 2019; 171:104767. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104767. View

4.
Dwyer C, Conington J, Corbiere F, Holmoy I, Muri K, Nowak R . Invited review: Improving neonatal survival in small ruminants: science into practice. Animal. 2015; 10(3):449-59. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115001974. View

5.
Robbins J, von Keyserlingk M, Fraser D, Weary D . INVITED REVIEW: Farm size and animal welfare. J Anim Sci. 2017; 94(12):5439-5455. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0805. View