» Articles » PMID: 38547183

Cohort Profile: The FarmMERGE Project-Merging Human and Animal Databases to Investigate the Relationship Between Farmer and Livestock Health and Welfare. The HUNT Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Mar 28
PMID 38547183
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stockmanship is an important determinant for good animal welfare and health. The goal of the FarmMERGE project is to investigate the associations between farmer health and work environment, and the health, productivity and welfare of their livestock. We merged several livestock industry databases with a major total population-based health study in Norway (The Trøndelag Health Study 2017-2019 (HUNT4)). This paper describes the project's collection and merging of data, and the cohort of farmers and farms that were identified as a result of our registry merge. There were 56,042 participants of HUNT4 (Nord-Trøndelag County participants only, participation rate: 54.0%). We merged a list of HUNT4 participants whose self-reported main occupation was "farmer" (n = 2,407) with agricultural databases containing production and health data from sheep, swine, dairy and beef cattle from 2017-2020. The Central Coordinating Register for Legal Entities was used as an intermediary step to achieve a link between the farmer and farming enterprise data. We identified 816 farmers (89.5% male, mean age 51.3 years) who had roles in 771 farming enterprises with documented animal production. The cohort included 675 unique farmer-farm combinations in cattle production, 139 in sheep, and 125 in swine. We linked at least one HUNT4 participant to approximately 63% of the dairy farms, 53% of the beef cattle farms, 30% of the sheep farms, and 38% of the swine farms in Nord-Trøndelag County in the 2017-2019 period. Using existing databases may be an efficient way of collecting large amounts of data for research, and using total population-based human health surveys may decrease response bias. However, the quality of the resulting research data will depend on the quality of the databases used, and thorough knowledge of the databases is required.

References
1.
Osborne A, Blake C, Fullen B, Meredith D, Phelan J, McNamara J . Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among farmers: A systematic review. Am J Ind Med. 2011; 55(2):143-58. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.21033. View

2.
Holmberg S, Thelin A, Stiernstrom E, Svardsudd K . The impact of physical work exposure on musculoskeletal symptoms among farmers and rural non-farmers. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003; 10(2):179-84. View

3.
Hansen B, Osteras O . Farmer welfare and animal welfare- Exploring the relationship between farmer's occupational well-being and stress, farm expansion and animal welfare. Prev Vet Med. 2019; 170:104741. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104741. View

4.
Kennedy A, Adams J, Dwyer J, Rahman M, Brumby S . Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6). PMC: 7143525. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062010. View

5.
Jones-Bitton A, Best C, Mactavish J, Fleming S, Hoy S . Stress, anxiety, depression, and resilience in Canadian farmers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019; 55(2):229-236. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-019-01738-2. View