» Articles » PMID: 32867241

Nanotechnology-Based Medical Devices for the Treatment of Chronic Skin Lesions: From Research to the Clinic

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Sep 2
PMID 32867241
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chronic wounds, such as pressure ulcers, diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers and arterial insufficiency ulcers, are lesions that fail to proceed through the normal healing process within a period of 12 weeks. The treatment of skin chronic wounds still represents a great challenge. Wound medical devices (MDs) range from conventional and advanced dressings, up to skin grafts, but none of these are generally recognized as a gold standard. Based on recent developments, this paper reviews nanotechnology-based medical devices intended as skin substitutes. In particular, nanofibrous scaffolds are promising platforms for wound healing, especially due to their similarity to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and their capability to promote cell adhesion and proliferation, and to restore skin integrity, when grafted into the wound site. Nanotechnology-based scaffolds are emphasized here. The discussion will be focused on the definition of critical quality attributes (chemical and physical characterization, stability, particle size, surface properties, release of nanoparticles from MDs, sterility and apyrogenicity), the preclinical evaluation (biocompatibility testing, alternative tests for irritation and sensitization, wound healing test and animal wound models), the clinical evaluation and the CE (European Conformity) marking of nanotechnology-based MDs.

Citing Articles

Nanotechnology-based biomedical devices in the cancer diagnostics and therapy.

Tantray J, Patel A, Parveen H, Prajapati B, Prajapati J Med Oncol. 2025; 42(2):50.

PMID: 39828813 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-025-02602-x.


Smart copper-doped clays in biomimetic microparticles for wound healing and infection control.

Ruggeri M, Nomicisio C, Taviot-Gueho C, Vigani B, Boselli C, Grisoli P Mater Today Bio. 2024; 29:101292.

PMID: 39483391 PMC: 11525154. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101292.


Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication for skin modeling.

Wistner S, Rashad L, Slaughter G Bioprinting. 2024; 35.

PMID: 38645432 PMC: 11031264. DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00306.


Extracellular vesicles modulate key signalling pathways in refractory wound healing.

Yang B, Lin Y, Huang Y, Zhu N, Shen Y Burns Trauma. 2023; 11:tkad039.

PMID: 38026441 PMC: 10654481. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkad039.


Nanotechnology development in surgical applications: recent trends and developments.

Abaszadeh F, Ashoub M, Khajouie G, Amiri M Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):537.

PMID: 38001554 PMC: 10668503. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01429-4.


References
1.
Abdullahi A, Amini-Nik S, Jeschke M . Animal models in burn research. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014; 71(17):3241-55. PMC: 4134422. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1612-5. View

2.
Lee M, Hwang J, Lim K . Alternatives to Draize Rabbit Eye and Skin Irritation Tests with a Focus on 3D Reconstructed Human Cornea-Like Epithelium and Epidermis Models. Toxicol Res. 2017; 33(3):191-203. PMC: 5523559. DOI: 10.5487/TR.2017.33.3.191. View

3.
Dusinska M, Tulinska J, El Yamani N, Kuricova M, Liskova A, Rollerova E . Immunotoxicity, genotoxicity and epigenetic toxicity of nanomaterials: New strategies for toxicity testing?. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017; 109(Pt 1):797-811. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.030. View

4.
Shailajan S, Menon S, Pednekar S, Singh A . Wound healing efficacy of Jatyadi Taila: in vivo evaluation in rat using excision wound model. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011; 138(1):99-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.08.050. View

5.
Mofazzal Jahromi M, Zangabad P, Moosavi Basri S, Sahandi Zangabad K, Ghamarypour A, Aref A . Nanomedicine and advanced technologies for burns: Preventing infection and facilitating wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017; 123:33-64. PMC: 5742034. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.08.001. View