» Articles » PMID: 32867151

The Level of Preoperative Plasma KRAS Mutations and CEA Predict Survival of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Sep 2
PMID 32867151
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) belongs to the most common cancers. The liver is a predominant site of CRC dissemination. Novel biomarkers for predicting the survival of CRC patients with liver metastases (CLM) undergoing metastasectomy are needed. We examined KRAS mutated circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in CLM patients as a prognostic biomarker, independently or in combination with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Thereby, a total of 71 CLM were retrospectively analyzed. Seven KRAS G12/G13 mutations was analyzed by a ddPCR™ KRAS G12/G13 Screening Kit on QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) in liver metastasis tissue and preoperative and postoperative plasma samples. CEA were determined by an ACCESS CEA assay with the UniCel DxI 800 Instrument (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Tissue KRAS positive liver metastases was detected in 33 of 69 patients (47.8%). Preoperative plasma samples were available in 30 patients and 11 (36.7%) were KRAS positive. The agreement between plasma- and tissue-based KRAS mutation status was 75.9% (22 in 29; kappa 0.529). Patients with high compared to low levels of preoperative plasma KRAS fractional abundance (cut-off 3.33%) experienced shorter overall survival (OS 647 vs. 1392 days, = 0.003). The combination of high preoperative KRAS fractional abundance and high CEA (cut-off 3.33% and 4.9 µg/L, resp.) best predicted shorter OS (HR 13.638, 95%CI 1.567-118.725) in multivariate analysis also (OS HR 44.877, 95%CI 1.59-1266.479; covariates: extend of liver resection, biological treatment). KRAS mutations are detectable and quantifiable in preoperative plasma cell-free DNA, incompletely overlapping with tissue biopsy. KRAS mutated ctDNA is a prognostic factor for CLM patients undergoing liver metastasectomy. The best prognostic value can be reached by a combination of ctDNA and tumor marker CEA.

Citing Articles

Advances in carcinoembryonic antigen detection: a review of clinical applications and standardization.

Sun H, Liu J, Zhang Q, Yang L, Zhou M, Song D Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025; .

PMID: 40069381 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-025-05772-9.


The combined evaluation of preoperative serum CEA and postoperative tissue CEA as a prognostic factor in stages 0-IV colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Tong G, Li H, Shen Y, Tan Z, Qian H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1447041.

PMID: 39830382 PMC: 11739305. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1447041.


Mutations in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prevalence, Prognostic Value, and G12/G13 Detection in Cell-Free DNA.

Thongyoo P, Chindaprasirt J, Aphivatanasiri C, Intarawichian P, Kunprom W, Kongpetch S Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2024; 22(1):112-126.

PMID: 39730186 PMC: 11696325. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20492.


Molecular profiling and patient selection for the multimodal approaches for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases.

Araujo R, Fonseca L, Silva R, Linhares M, Uson Junior P Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024; 13(2):273-292.

PMID: 38617479 PMC: 11007353. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-22-616.


Prognostic role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients receiving liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A meta-analysis.

Tang F, Huang C, Tang Z, Lu S, Bai T, Huang Q World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 15(12):2890-2906.

PMID: 38222018 PMC: 10784827. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2890.


References
1.
Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Stromberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J . Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):78. PMC: 5769309. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x. View

2.
Karapetis C, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker D, OCallaghan C, Tu D, Tebbutt N . K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(17):1757-65. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385. View

3.
Tan E, Gouvas N, Nicholls R, Ziprin P, Xynos E, Tekkis P . Diagnostic precision of carcinoembryonic antigen in the detection of recurrence of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2008; 18(1):15-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.05.008. View

4.
Golubnitschaja O, Polivka Jr J, Yeghiazaryan K, Berliner L . Liquid biopsy and multiparametric analysis in management of liver malignancies: new concepts of the patient stratification and prognostic approach. EPMA J. 2018; 9(3):271-285. PMC: 6107456. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-018-0146-6. View

5.
Vymetalkova V, Cervena K, Bartu L, Vodicka P . Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(11). PMC: 6274807. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113356. View