» Articles » PMID: 32866336

A Unified Framework for Understanding Nucleophilicity and Protophilicity in the S 2/E2 Competition

Overview
Journal Chemistry
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2020 Sep 1
PMID 32866336
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The concepts of nucleophilicity and protophilicity are fundamental and ubiquitous in chemistry. A case in point is bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (S 2) and base-induced elimination (E2). A Lewis base acting as a strong nucleophile is needed for S 2 reactions, whereas a Lewis base acting as a strong protophile (i.e., base) is required for E2 reactions. A complicating factor is, however, the fact that a good nucleophile is often a strong protophile. Nevertheless, a sound, physical model that explains, in a transparent manner, when an electron-rich Lewis base acts as a protophile or a nucleophile, which is not just phenomenological, is currently lacking in the literature. To address this fundamental question, the potential energy surfaces of the S 2 and E2 reactions of X +C H Y model systems with X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I, and At, are explored by using relativistic density functional theory at ZORA-OLYP/TZ2P. These explorations have yielded a consistent overview of reactivity trends over a wide range in reactivity and pathways. Activation strain analyses of these reactions reveal the factors that determine the shape of the potential energy surfaces and hence govern the propensity of the Lewis base to act as a nucleophile or protophile. The concepts of "characteristic distortivity" and "transition state acidity" of a reaction are introduced, which have the potential to enable chemists to better understand and design reactions for synthesis.

Citing Articles

Enantioconvergent nucleophilic substitution via synergistic phase-transfer catalysis.

Dooley C, Ibba F, Botlik B, Palladino C, Goult C, Gao Y Nat Catal. 2025; 8(2):107-115.

PMID: 40017632 PMC: 11860226. DOI: 10.1038/s41929-024-01288-0.


How Microsolvation Affects the Balance of Atomic Level Mechanism in Substitution and Elimination Reactions: Insights into the Role of Solvent Molecules in Inducing Mechanistic Transitions.

Fu G, Wang H, Zhen W, Zhou X, Yang L, Zhang J Molecules. 2025; 30(3).

PMID: 39942607 PMC: 11819716. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30030496.


Selenium Nucleophilicity and Electrophilicity in the Intra- and Intermolecular S2 Reactions of Selenenyl Sulfide Probes.

Madabeni A, Zeisel L, Thorn-Seshold O, Orian L Chemistry. 2025; 31(12):e202404580.

PMID: 39847043 PMC: 11855254. DOI: 10.1002/chem.202404580.


Benchmark Ab Initio Mapping of the F + CHClI S2 and Proton-Abstraction Reactions.

Tasi D, Orjan E, Czako G J Phys Chem A. 2024; 128(49):10568-10578.

PMID: 39621865 PMC: 11647900. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06716.


A Trade-off between Solvation and Collision Activation in Steering Competing E2 and S2 Dynamics.

Wang H, Liu X, Zhao S, Fu G, Zhen W, Yang L Precis Chem. 2024; 2(1):40-48.

PMID: 39474569 PMC: 11503777. DOI: 10.1021/prechem.3c00088.


References
1.
Bickelhaupt F . Base-induced 1,4-elimination: insights from theory and mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2002; 20(6):347-61. DOI: 10.1002/mas.10007. View

2.
van Lenthe E, Baerends E . Optimized Slater-type basis sets for the elements 1-118. J Comput Chem. 2003; 24(9):1142-56. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10255. View

3.
Garver J, Fang Y, Eyet N, Villano S, Bierbaum V, Westaway K . A direct comparison of reactivity and mechanism in the gas phase and in solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2010; 132(11):3808-14. DOI: 10.1021/ja909399u. View

4.
Hajdu B, Czako G . Benchmark ab Initio Characterization of the Complex Potential Energy Surfaces of the X + NHY [X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I] Reactions. J Phys Chem A. 2018; 122(7):1886-1895. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11927. View

5.
Carrascosa E, Meyer J, Zhang J, Stei M, Michaelsen T, Hase W . Imaging dynamic fingerprints of competing E2 and S2 reactions. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):25. PMC: 5479782. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00065-x. View