Impact of Interventionalist's Experience and Gender on Radiation Dose and Procedural Time in CT-guided Interventions-a Retrospective Analysis of 4380 Cases over 10 Years

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2020 Aug 28

PMID 32851446

Citations 2

Authors

Dorothea Theilig

Anna Mayerhofer

David Petschelt

Aboelyazid Elkilany

Bernd Hamm

Bernhard Gebauer

Dominik Geisel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of the interventionalist's experience and gender on radiation dose and procedural time in CT-guided interventions.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4380 CT-guided interventions performed at our institution with the same CT scanner from 2009 until 2018, 1287 (29%) by female and 3093 (71%) by male interventionalists. Radiation dose, number of CT fluoroscopy images taken per intervention, total procedural time, type of intervention, and degree of difficulty were derived from the saved dose reports and images. All 16 interventionalists included in this analysis performed their first CT-guided interventions during the study period, and interventions performed by each interventionalist were counted to assess the level of experience for each intervention in terms of the number of prior interventions performed by her or him. The Mann-Whitney U test (MWU test), multivariate regression, and linear mixed model analysis were performed.

Results: Assessment of the impact of gender with the MWU test revealed that female interventionalists took a significantly smaller number of images (p < 0.0001) and achieved a lower dose-length product per intervention (p < 0.0001) while taking more time per intervention (p = 0.0001). This finding was confirmed for most types of interventions when additionally accounting for other possible impact factors in multivariate regression analysis. In linear mixed model analysis, we found that radiation dose, number of images taken per intervention, and procedural time decreased statistically significantly with interventionalist's experience.

Conclusions: Radiation doses of CT-guided interventions are reduced by interventionalist's experience and, for most types of interventions, when performed by female interventionalists.

Key Points: • Radiation doses in CT-guided interventions are lower when performed by female interventionalists. • Procedural times of CT-guided interventions are longer when performed by female interventionalists. • Radiation doses of CT-guided interventions decrease with the interventionalist's experience.

Citing Articles

Effect of Spectral Filtering and Segmental X-ray Tube Current Switch-Off on Interventionalist's Scatter Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy.

Grosser O, Volk M, Georgiades M, Punzet D, Alsawalhi B, Kupitz D Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199796 PMC: 11351108. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080838.

Helical CT versus intermittent CT fluoroscopic guidance for musculoskeletal needle biopsies: impact on radiation exposure, procedure time, diagnostic yield, and adverse events.

Cahalane A, Habibollahi S, Staffa S, Yang K, Fintelmann F, Chang C Skeletal Radiol. 2022; 52(6):1119-1126.

PMID: 36355218 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04226-y.

References

Ciraj-Bjelac O, Antic V, Selakovic J, Bozovic P, Arandjic D, Pavlovic S . EYE LENS EXPOSURE TO MEDICAL STAFF PERFORMING ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY PROCEDURES: DOSE ASSESSMENT AND CORRELATION TO PATIENT DOSE. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016; 172(4):475-482. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv552. View

Heyer C, Peters S, Lemburg S, Nicolas V . [Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: what do non-radiologists know?]. Rofo. 2007; 179(3):261-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927366. View

Huang K, Lan Y, Fang W, Chen J, Lo S, Li A . Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e111499. PMC: 4216064. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111499. View

Rathmann N, Haeusler U, Diezler P, Weiss C, Kostrzewa M, Sadick M . Evaluation of radiation exposure of medical staff during CT-guided interventions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 12(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.04.012. View

Carlson S, BENDER C, Classic K, Zink F, Quam J, Ward E . Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001; 219(2):515-20. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma41515. View

Lucey B, Varghese J, Hochberg A, Blake M, Soto J . CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(5):1187-94. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0378. View

Pradella M, Trumm C, Stieltjes B, Boll D, Zech C, Huegli R . Impact factors for safety, success, duration and radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1099):20180937. PMC: 6636272. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180937. View

Mohapatra A, Greenberg R, Mastracci T, Eagleton M, Thornsberry B . Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 58(3):702-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.032. View

Silverman S, Deuson T, Kane N, Adams D, Seltzer S, Phillips M . Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: cost-identification analysis. Radiology. 1998; 206(2):429-35. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457196. View

10.

Elsholtz F, Vahldiek J, Wyschkon S, de Bucourt M, Koletzko G, Hamm B . Radiation exposure of radiologists during different types of CT-guided interventions: an evaluation using dosimeters placed above and under lead protection. Acta Radiol. 2019; 61(1):110-116. DOI: 10.1177/0284185119852734. View

11.

Williams J . The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70(833):498-503. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227232. View

12.

Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez J, Ten J . Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol. 1999; 71(849):954-60. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.849.10195011. View

13.

Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C, Fazio V . Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(1):83-91. PMC: 1357708. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68. View

14.

Paulson E, Sheafor D, Enterline D, McAdams H, Yoshizumi T . CT fluoroscopy--guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology. 2001; 220(1):161-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl29161. View

15.

Alves J, Sarmento S, Pereira J, Pereira M, Sousa M, Cunha L . Dose to the interventional radiologist in CTF-guided procedures. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019; 58(3):373-384. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00792-3. View

16.

Sadigh G, Khan R, Kassin M, Applegate K . Radiation safety knowledge and perceptions among residents: a potential improvement opportunity for graduate medical education in the United States. Acad Radiol. 2014; 21(7):869-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.016. View

17.

Lamba R . Radiation dose optimization for CT-guided interventional procedures in the abdomen and pelvis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11(3):279-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.004. View

18.

Faulkner A, Bourgeois A, Bradley Y, Hudson K, Heidel R, Pasciak A . Simulation-based educational curriculum for fluoroscopically guided lumbar puncture improves operator confidence and reduces patient dose. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22(5):668-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.024. View

19.

Weyland C, Hemmerich F, Mohlenbruch M, Bendszus M, Pfaff J . Radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time in mechanical thrombectomy of anterior circulation ischemic stroke depending on the interventionalist's experience-a retrospective single center experience. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(3):1564-1570. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06482-4. View

20.

Leng S, Christner J, Carlson S, Jacobsen M, Vrieze T, Atwell T . Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(1):W97-103. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5057. View