Variation in the Observed Effect of Xpert MTB/RIF Testing for Tuberculosis on Mortality: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trial Design Considerations
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Most studies evaluating the effect of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) concluded that it did not reduce overall mortality compared to usual care. We conducted a systematic review to assess whether key study design and execution features contributed to earlier identification of patients with TB and decreased pre-treatment loss to follow-up, thereby reducing the potential impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Scopus for literature published from 1 January 2009 to February 2019. We included all primary intervention studies that had evaluated the effect of Xpert MTB/RIF on mortality compared to usual care in participants with presumptive pulmonary TB. We critically reviewed features of included studies across: Study setting and context, Study population, Participant recruitment and enrolment, Study procedures, and Study follow-up. We included seven randomised and one non-randomised study. All included studies demonstrated relative reductions in overall mortality in the Xpert MTB/RIF arm ranging from 6% to 40%. However, mortality reduction was reported to be statistically significant in two studies. Study features that could explain the lack of observed effect on mortality included: the higher quality of care at study sites; inclusion of patients with a higher pre-test probability of TB leading to higher than expected empirical rates; performance of additional diagnostic testing not done in usual care leading to increased TB diagnosis or empiric treatment initiation; the recruitment of participants likely to return for follow-up; and involvement of study staff in ensuring adherence with care and follow-up. Most studies of Xpert MTB/RIF were designed and conducted in a manner that resulted in more patients being diagnosed and treated for TB, minimising the potential difference in mortality Xpert MTB/RIF testing could have achieved compared to usual care.
Katamba A, Mochizuki T, Nalugwa T, Nantale M, Oyuku D, Nabwire S EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102953.
PMID: 39659443 PMC: 11629260. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953.
De Vos E, Westreich D, Scott L, De Lima Y, Stevens W, Hayes C PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(9):e0001989.
PMID: 37656670 PMC: 10473529. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001989.
Impact of the diagnostic test Xpert MTB/RIF on patient outcomes for tuberculosis.
Haraka F, Kakolwa M, Schumacher S, Nathavitharana R, Denkinger C, Gagneux S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 5:CD012972.
PMID: 34097769 PMC: 8208889. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012972.pub2.
Ochodo E, Kalema N, Schumacher S, Steingart K, Young T, Mallett S Wellcome Open Res. 2020; 4:173.
PMID: 32851196 PMC: 7438967. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15412.2.
Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.
Maclean E, Kohli M, Weber S, Suresh A, Schumacher S, Denkinger C J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58(10).
PMID: 32759357 PMC: 7512154. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01582-19.