» Articles » PMID: 32848405

Truck Drivers' Cigarette Smoking and Preferred Smoking Cessation Methods

Overview
Journal Subst Abuse
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32848405
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Some studies show that truck drivers use tobacco and other stimulants to stay awake as they drive. Despite their increased risks for many of tobacco-related health disparities, there is limited engagement of truck drivers in smoking cessation programs. The objective of this study was to describe smoking characteristics and identify their preferred smoking cessation methods among truck drivers.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional mixed methods study. Participants were truck drivers recruited at trucking companies in Utah in 2019. Participants were either individually interviewed (n = 4), or filled out a survey (n = 33). We conducted qualitative data analysis of the interviews followed by descriptive statistics of smoking and cessation characteristics from the survey.

Results: Reasons for smoking included, staying awake, stress reduction, or something to do while driving. Of the drivers surveyed, 68.8% were daily smokers while 97% had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their life time. The mean number of cigarettes per day (cpd) was 15.7, and 25 among those who had 10 or more cpd. Sixty-one percent had made at least a quit attempt. In addition to counseling or brief advice, 68% reported interest in using Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) either as gum or patch to help them quit. 21% reported interest in telephone text messaging to engage them in treatment.

Conclusion: Cigarette smoking is a public health problem among truck drivers. Our findings suggest that truck drivers are interested in quitting smoking. Evidence based interventions tailored to this population are needed to help them quit and reduce their smoking-related morbidity.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases of Long-Haul Truck Drivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review.

Lise F, Shattell M, Garcia F, Kincl L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39063474 PMC: 11276728. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070897.


Brain dysfunctions and neurotoxicity induced by psychostimulants in experimental models and humans: an overview of recent findings.

Serra M, Simola N, Pollack A, Costa G Neural Regen Res. 2024; 19(9):1908-1918.

PMID: 38227515 PMC: 11040293. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.390971.


Challenges in Conducting Empirical Epidemiological Research with Truck and Bus Drivers in Diverse Settings in North America.

Soccolich S, Ridgeway C, Mabry J, Camden M, Miller A, Iridiastadi H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36231791 PMC: 9566617. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912494.


Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Prevalence Among Long-Haul Truck Drivers in the United States.

Rogers C, May F, Petersen E, Brooks E, Lopez J, Kennedy C Am J Health Promot. 2022; 36(7):1142-1151.

PMID: 35410488 PMC: 9420779. DOI: 10.1177/08901171221090500.

References
1.
Jain N, Hart J, Smith T, Garshick E, Laden F . Smoking behavior in trucking industry workers. Am J Ind Med. 2006; 49(12):1013-20. PMC: 1945044. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20399. View

2.
Zhang L, Samet J, Caffo B, Punjabi N . Cigarette smoking and nocturnal sleep architecture. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164(6):529-37. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj231. View

3.
Thiese M, Effiong A, Ott U, Passey D, Arnold Z, Ronna B . A Clinical Trial on Weight Loss among Truck Drivers. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015; 6(2):104-12. PMC: 6977040. DOI: 10.15171/ijoem.2015.551. View

4.
Weinberger A, Pacek L, Giovenco D, Galea S, Zvolensky M, Gbedemah M . Cigarette Use Among Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorders in the United States, 2002 to 2016: Trends Overall and by Race/Ethnicity. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018; 43(1):79-90. PMC: 6446564. DOI: 10.1111/acer.13922. View

5.
Hurt R, Ebbert J, Hays J, McFadden D . Treating tobacco dependence in a medical setting. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(5):314-26. PMC: 3903579. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20031. View