» Articles » PMID: 32848056

Structural Cavities Are Critical to Balancing Stability and Activity of a Membrane-integral Enzyme

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32848056
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Packing interaction is a critical driving force in the folding of helical membrane proteins. Despite the importance, packing defects (i.e., cavities including voids, pockets, and pores) are prevalent in membrane-integral enzymes, channels, transporters, and receptors, playing essential roles in function. Then, a question arises regarding how the two competing requirements, packing for stability vs. cavities for function, are reconciled in membrane protein structures. Here, using the intramembrane protease GlpG of as a model and cavity-filling mutation as a probe, we tested the impacts of native cavities on the thermodynamic stability and function of a membrane protein. We find several stabilizing mutations which induce substantial activity reduction without distorting the active site. Notably, these mutations are all mapped onto the regions of conformational flexibility and functional importance, indicating that the cavities facilitate functional movement of GlpG while compromising the stability. Experiment and molecular dynamics simulation suggest that the stabilization is induced by the coupling between enhanced protein packing and weakly unfavorable lipid desolvation, or solely by favorable lipid solvation on the cavities. Our result suggests that, stabilized by the relatively weak interactions with lipids, cavities are accommodated in membrane proteins without severe energetic cost, which, in turn, serve as a platform to fine-tune the balance between stability and flexibility for optimal activity.

Citing Articles

Biological Implications of the Intrinsic Deformability of Human Acetylcholinesterase Induced by Diverse Compounds: A Computational Study.

Alvarado Y, Gonzalez-Paz L, Paz J, Lorono-Gonzalez M, Santiago Contreras J, Lossada C Biology (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765732 PMC: 11672903. DOI: 10.3390/biology13121065.


Steric trapping strategy for studying the folding of helical membrane proteins.

Yao J, Hong H Methods. 2024; 225:1-12.

PMID: 38428472 PMC: 11107808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.02.007.


Statistical Analysis of the Role of Cavity Flexibility in Thermostability of Proteins.

Hong S, Yoon J, An Y, Lee S, Cha H, Pandey A Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38276699 PMC: 10819066. DOI: 10.3390/polym16020291.


In silico comparative structural and compositional analysis of glycoproteins of RSV to study the nature of stability and transmissibility of RSV A.

Mitra D, Mohapatra P Syst Microbiol Biomanuf. 2023; 3(2):312-327.

PMID: 38013803 PMC: 9135598. DOI: 10.1007/s43393-022-00110-x.


Dawn of a New Era for Membrane Protein Design.

Sowlati-Hashjin S, Gandhi A, Garton M Biodes Res. 2023; 2022:9791435.

PMID: 37850134 PMC: 10521746. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9791435.


References
1.
Cho S, Dickey S, Urban S . Crystal Structures and Inhibition Kinetics Reveal a Two-Stage Catalytic Mechanism with Drug Design Implications for Rhomboid Proteolysis. Mol Cell. 2016; 61(3):329-340. PMC: 4744120. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.022. View

2.
Stouffer A, Ma C, Cristian L, Ohigashi Y, Lamb R, Lear J . The interplay of functional tuning, drug resistance, and thermodynamic stability in the evolution of the M2 proton channel from the influenza A virus. Structure. 2008; 16(7):1067-76. PMC: 2594009. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.04.011. View

3.
Wang Y, Ha Y . Open-cap conformation of intramembrane protease GlpG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(7):2098-102. PMC: 1892946. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611080104. View

4.
Richards F . Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977; 6:151-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055. View

5.
Wen J, Chen X, Bowie J . Exploring the allowed sequence space of a membrane protein. Nat Struct Biol. 1996; 3(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1038/nsb0296-141. View