» Articles » PMID: 32833467

Asymmetrical Interference Between Item and Order Information in Short-term Memory

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32833467
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To recall a list of items just after the end of the presentation, participants must encode both the items and the order in which they were presented. Despite a long history of studying item and order information, little is known regarding the relation between them. Here, we examined this issue with a novel task in which participants saw two 4- or 6-item lists on each trial, along with specific instructions for each list to be encoded for subsequent item information retrieval or order reconstruction. In Experiments 1, 2, and 5, words were used for both item and order lists, whereas in Experiments 3 and 4, words were used for one list and characters for the other. An item recognition task was used in Experiments 1-4, and item reconstruction from a fragment was used in Experiment 5. The general finding was that order retention was hindered when both lists required order reconstruction compared to when one list required item information only. In certain circumstances, retention of items in the first list was impaired when the second list also required item retention. We address the pattern of results with a new theoretical account in which overwriting occurs for similar materials and in which there is a capacity limit specific to order information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

The tradeoff between item and order information in short-term memory does not depend on encoding time.

Guitard D, Cowan N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022; 49(1):51-70.

PMID: 36355706 PMC: 10029126. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001074.


Tradeoffs between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory.

Guitard D, Saint-Aubin J, Cowan N J Mem Lang. 2022; 122.

PMID: 36061403 PMC: 9435734. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104300.


Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.

Cowan N, Guitard D, Greene N, Fiset S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022; 48(11):1638-1659.

PMID: 35007100 PMC: 9271142. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001077.


Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory.

Guitard D, Saint-Aubin J, Cowan N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020; 47(2):243-263.

PMID: 32833467 PMC: 7963515. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000956.

References
1.
Camos V, Lagner P, Loaiza V . Maintenance of item and order information in verbal working memory. Memory. 2016; 25(8):953-968. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1237654. View

2.
Surprenant A, Brown M, Jalbert A, Neath I, Bireta T, Tehan G . Backward recall and the word length effect. Am J Psychol. 2011; 124(1):75-86. DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0075. View

3.
Craik F, Gavrilescu D, Anderson N . Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(6):965-76. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209344. View

4.
Guitard D, Saint-Aubin J, Cowan N . Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020; 47(2):243-263. PMC: 7963515. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000956. View

5.
Wahlheim C, Huff M . Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall. Psychol Aging. 2015; 30(4):768-80. PMC: 4679636. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000049. View