» Articles » PMID: 32832728

Global Longitudinal Strain Changes During Hemorrhagic Shock: An Experimental Study

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32832728
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) appears sensitive and reproducible to identify left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The main objective was to analyze the GLS changes in an anesthetized-piglet model of controlled hemorrhagic shock (HS). The secondary objective was to evaluate if GLS changes was different depending on the expansion fluid treatment with or without norepinephrine.

Methods: Eighteen anesthetized and ventilated piglets were bled until the mean arterial pressure reached 40 mmHg. Controlled hemorrhage was maintained for 30 min before randomizing the piglets to three resuscitation groups: control group, LR group (resuscitated with lactated ringer), and NA group (resuscitated with lactated ringer and norepinephrine).

Results: There was no difference in the baseline hemodynamic, biological, and ultrasound data among the three groups. During the hemorrhagic phase, the GLS increased significantly from 25 mL/kg of depletion. During the resuscitation phase, the GLS decreased significantly from 20 mL/kg of fluid administration. There was no difference in GLS variation among the groups during the hemorrhagic, maintenance, and resuscitation phases.

Conclusion: In our HS model, GLS increased with hemorrhage and decreased during resuscitation, showing its preload dependence.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a New Echocardiographic Tool for Cardiac Output Monitoring: An Experimental Study on A Controlled Hemorrhagic Shock Model in Anesthetized Piglets.

Markarian T, Grau-Mercier L, Occelli C, Ajavon F, Claret P, Coisy F J Clin Med. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36143066 PMC: 9503332. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185420.

References
1.
Haugaa K, Edvardsen T . Global longitudinal strain: the best biomarker for predicting prognosis in heart failure?. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18(11):1340-1341. PMC: 5129538. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.632. View

2.
Ao-Ieong E, Williams A, Jani V, Cabrales P . Cardiac function during resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock with polymerized bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen therapeutic. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016; 45(4):686-693. PMC: 5474290. DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2016.1241797. View

3.
Stadlbauer K, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger H, Krismer A, Konigsrainer A, Voelckel W . An observational study of vasopressin infusion during uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock in a porcine trauma model: Effects on bowel function. Resuscitation. 2006; 72(1):145-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.022. View

4.
Roger C, MULLER L, Deras P, Louart G, Nouvellon E, Molinari N . Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 112(6):1015-23. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet375. View

5.
Mendes L, Ribeiras R, Adragao T, Lima S, Horta E, Reis C . Load-independent parameters of diastolic and systolic function by speckle tracking and tissue doppler in hemodialysis patients. Rev Port Cardiol. 2008; 27(9):1011-25. View