» Articles » PMID: 32819410

Towards a Taxonomy of Behavior Change Techniques for Promoting Shared Decision Making

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Aug 22
PMID 32819410
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is little information about the functions and behavior change techniques (BCTs) needed to implement shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice. To guide future implementation initiatives, we sought to develop a BCT taxonomy for SDM implementation interventions.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of a 2018 Cochrane review on interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. We examined all 87 studies included in the review. We extracted relevant information on each study intervention into a spreadsheet. Coders had undergone a training workshop on intervention functions and online training on BCT Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). We performed functions and BCTs coding trials, and identified coding rules. We used Michie's guide for designing behavior change interventions to code the functions and BCTs used in the interventions. Coders met to compare coding and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. Data was analyzed using simple descriptive statistics.

Results: Overall, 7 functions, 24 combinations of functions and 32 BCTs were used in the 87 SDM implementation interventions. The mean of functions per intervention was 2.5 and the mean of BCTs per intervention was 3.7. The functions Coercion and Restriction were not found. The most common function was Education (73 studies). Three combinations of functions were most common (e.g: Education + Persuasion, used in 10 studies). The functions associated with more effective SDM implementation interventions were Modeling and Training. The most effective combination of functions was Education + Training + Modeling + Enablement. The most commonly used BCT was Instruction on how to perform the behavior (43 studies). BCTs associated with more effective SDM implementation interventions were: Instruction on how to perform the behavior, Demonstration of the behavior, Feedback on behavior, Pharmacological support, Material reward, and Biofeedback. Twenty-five BCTs were associated with less effective SDM implementation interventions. Four new BCTs were identified: General information to support the behavior, Tailoring, Exercises to conceptually prepare for the behavior, and Experience sharing and learning.

Conclusions: We established a BCT taxonomy specific to the field of SDM to guide future SDM implementation interventions. Four new BCTs should be added to BCTTv1.

Citing Articles

Development and preliminary evaluation of a decision coach training module for nurses in Norway.

Kienlin S, Nytroen K, Kasper J, Stacey D BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):152.

PMID: 39930431 PMC: 11808981. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02569-6.


Barriers and Facilitators to User Engagement and Moderation for Web-Based Peer Support Among Young People: Qualitative Study Using the Behavior Change Wheel Framework.

Ananya A, Tuuli J, Perowne R, Gutman L JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e64097.

PMID: 39908551 PMC: 11840382. DOI: 10.2196/64097.


The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review.

Auf H, Svedberg P, Nygren J, Nair M, Lundgren L J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63548.

PMID: 39854710 PMC: 11806275. DOI: 10.2196/63548.


Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy.

van Hienen A, Offermann C, Boersma L, Jacobs M, Fijten R Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 50:100897.

PMID: 39670055 PMC: 11636202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897.


A Mobile Gaming App to Train Teenage Mothers on Appropriate Child Feeding Practices: Development and Validation Study.

Sosanya M, Samuel F, Bashir S, Omoera V, Freeland-Graves J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e53560.

PMID: 39326044 PMC: 11467632. DOI: 10.2196/53560.


References
1.
Michie S, Hyder N, Walia A, West R . Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2011; 36(4):315-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.016. View

2.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

3.
Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta F, Dombrowski S, Bishop A, French D . A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11):1479-98. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2010.540664. View

4.
Barry M, Edgman-Levitan S . Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):780-1. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283. View

5.
Moulton B, Collins P, Burns-Cox N, Coulter A . From informed consent to informed request: do we need a new gold standard?. J R Soc Med. 2013; 106(10):391-4. PMC: 3791094. DOI: 10.1177/0141076813490686. View