» Articles » PMID: 24941142

Coercion in Psychiatric Care: Clinical, Legal, and Ethical Controversies

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2014 Jun 19
PMID 24941142
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite a long-standing tradition of the use of coercion in psychiatric care, such as involuntary admission and treatment, few have systematically addressed this issue. In recent years, more research has been carried out, suggesting that the use of coercion has important and complex legal, ethical, and clinical implications. In the present article, types and rates of coercion are presented and central topics including competency, ethics, and the reasons given for the use of coercion, are critically discussed.

Citing Articles

Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees' normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement.

Molewijk B, Pedersen R, Kok A, Forde R, Aasland O BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):29.

PMID: 37173770 PMC: 10182617. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00909-w.


Geographical variation in compulsory hospitalisation - ethical challenges.

Hofstad T, Husum T, Rugkasa J, Hofmann B BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1507.

PMID: 36496384 PMC: 9737766. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08798-2.


Patients Who Die by Suicide: A Study of Treatment Patterns and Patient Safety Incidents in Norway.

Krvavac S, Jansson B, Bukholm I, Wynn R, Bystad M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17).

PMID: 36078401 PMC: 9517916. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710686.


Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.

Chieze M, Clavien C, Kaiser S, Hurst S Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:790886.

PMID: 34970171 PMC: 8712490. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886.


Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.

Lickiewicz J, Husum T, Ruud T, Siqveland J, Musial Z, Makara-Studzinska M Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:745215.

PMID: 34867536 PMC: 8635088. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215.