» Articles » PMID: 32817652

Different Amount of Training Affects Body Composition and Performance in High-Intensity Functional Training Participants

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Aug 21
PMID 32817652
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on body composition and the relationship of the latter with performance are not well defined. In this work we investigated, by means of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, the relative proportions of fat-, lean soft tissue-, and mineral mass in CrossFit® (CF, a popular mode of HIFT) participants (n = 24; age, 28.2 ± 3.39 y; BMI, 25.3 ± 2.04 kg/m2) with at least 1 year of CF training experience and weekly amount of training > 10 h/w (n = 13; Higher Training, HT) or < 10 h/w (n = 11; Lower Training, LT) as well as age- matched and BMI-matched physically active controls (CHT, CLT). Performance was assessed in the "Fran" workout. Data were analyzed by one-way or repeated measures ANOVA where needed. Association between variables was assessed with the Pearson's correlation coefficient r. Partial correlation was used where needed. Results showed that HT performed better than LT in the "Fran" (P < 0.001) and they had higher whole-body bone mineral density (P = 0.026) and higher lean soft mass (P = 0.002), and borderline lower percent fat mass (P = 0.050). The main difference between CF participants (HT, LT) and their respective controls (CHT, CLT) was a lower adiposity in the former. In CF participants, performance positively correlated with appendicular lean soft tissue mass (P = 0.030). It can be concluded that, in CF participants, a higher amount of weekly training improves most notably lean body mass and increases performance in association with increased skeletal muscle mass. CF participation is especially effective in reducing fat mass vs. age- and BMI-matched physically active controls.

Citing Articles

Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) for Assessment of Hydration Status: A Comparison between Endurance and Strength University Athletes.

Abdelnour M, Berkachy R, Nasreddine L, Fares E Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(18).

PMID: 39338769 PMC: 11435641. DOI: 10.3390/s24186024.


The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.

Martinho D, Rebelo A, Gouveia E, Field A, Costa R, Ribeiro A BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):196.

PMID: 39300545 PMC: 11414238. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3.


Somatotype and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis of Italian CrossFit® practitioners.

Cebrian-Ponce A, Serafini S, Petri C, Carrasco-Marginet M, Izzicupo P, Mascherini G Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e29139.

PMID: 38655297 PMC: 11035999. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29139.


Research on the effect of different aerobic activity on physical fitness and executive function in primary school students.

Ren Y, Chu J, Zhang Z, Luo B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7956.

PMID: 38575618 PMC: 10995128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58009-7.


CrossFit: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit Performance.

Meier N, Schlie J, Schmidt A Sports (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37368562 PMC: 10304543. DOI: 10.3390/sports11060112.


References
1.
Murawska-Cialowicz E, Wojna J, Zuwala-Jagiello J . Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016; 66(6):811-21. View

2.
Ralston G, Kilgore L, Wyatt F, Baker J . The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017; 47(12):2585-2601. PMC: 5684266. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7. View

3.
Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, McNulty V, Jones B . Extreme conditioning programs and injury risk in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. US Army Med Dep J. 2013; :36-47. View

4.
Santos D, Dawson J, Matias C, Rocha P, Minderico C, Allison D . Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e97846. PMC: 4022746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097846. View

5.
Kim J, Wang Z, Heymsfield S, Baumgartner R, Gallagher D . Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76(2):378-83. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/76.2.378. View