» Articles » PMID: 12840641

Variable Dose-response Relationship Between Exercise Training and Performance

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2003 Jul 4
PMID 12840641
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to propose a nonlinear model of the effects of training on performance. The new formulation introduced a variable to account for training-related changes in the magnitude and duration of exercise-induced fatigue.

Methods: Goodness-of-fit of the proposed model was compared with that of earlier models presented in the literature. Models were applied to six previously untrained subjects volunteers over a 15-wk endurance-training program composed of an 8-wk period with three sessions per week and a 4-wk period with five sessions, and the remaining weeks without training. Training sessions were composed of performance trial and intermittent exercise with 5-min work interspersed with 3-min recovery repeated four or five times. Performance was measured three times each week using average power during a 5-min all-out exercise.

Results: The training program resulted in 30 +/- 7% improvement in performance. The proposed model exhibited significantly improved fit with actual performance obtained in each subject. Standard error was 6.47 +/- 0.71 W for the proposed model and from 9.20 +/- 2.27 W to 10.31 +/- 1.56 W for earlier models. The model output using model parameters averaged over the six subjects was found to be similar to data published elsewhere obtained in athletes with more intense training.

Conclusion: The data obtained allowed us to demonstrate an inverted-U-shape relationship between daily amounts of training and performance. The fit between experimental data and model-derived predictions in similar situations showed the usefulness of the proposed model to predict responses to training with varied regimens.

Citing Articles

Statistical flaws of the fitness-fatigue sports performance prediction model.

Marchal A, Benazieb O, Weldegebriel Y, Meline T, Imbach F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3706.

PMID: 39881202 PMC: 11779798. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88153-7.


Differentiating acute fatigue and overreaching during intensified training using a recursive least squares algorithm combined with the variable dose-response model.

Busso T, Chalencon S Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39709585 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05692-z.


School's out for summer-Differences in training characteristics between adolescent biathletes of different performance levels.

Karstrom A, Laaksonen M, BjOrklund G PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0290408.

PMID: 37616200 PMC: 10449162. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290408.


Rating of Perceived Exertion in Professional Volleyball: A Systematic Review.

Rebelo A, Pereira J, Martinho D, Valente-Dos-Santos J J Hum Kinet. 2023; 87:143-155.

PMID: 37229414 PMC: 10203829. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/161614.


Toward a New Paradigm in Resistance Training by Means of Velocity Monitoring: A Critical and Challenging Narrative.

Gonzalez-Badillo J, Sanchez-Medina L, Ribas-Serna J, Rodriguez-Rosell D Sports Med Open. 2022; 8(1):118.

PMID: 36114395 PMC: 9481798. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00513-z.