» Articles » PMID: 32814825

Functional, Physiological and Subjective Responses to Concurrent Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Exercise in Adult Cancer Survivors: a Controlled Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Aug 21
PMID 32814825
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the functional, physiological and subjective responses to NMES exercise in cancer patients. Participants with a cancer diagnosis, currently undergoing treatment, and an had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG) of 1 and 2 were recommended to participate by their oncologist. Following a 2-week, no-NMES control period, each participant was asked to undertake a concurrent NMES exercise intervention over a 4-week period. Functional muscle strength [30 s sit-to-stand (30STS)], mobility [timed up and go (TUG)], exercise capacity [6-min walk test (6MWT)] and health related quality of life (HR-QoL) were assessed at baseline 1 (BL1), 2-week post control (BL2) and post 4-week NMES exercise intervention (POST). Physiological and subjective responses to LF-NMES were assessed during a 10-stage incremental session, recorded at BL2 and POST. Fourteen participants [mean age: 62 years (10)] completed the intervention. No adverse events were reported. 30STS (+ 2.4 reps, p = .007), and 6MWT (+ 44.3 m, p = .028) significantly improved after the intervention. No changes in TUG or HR-QoL were observed at POST. Concurrent NMES exercise may be an effective exercise intervention for augmenting physical function in participants with cancer and moderate and poor functional status. Implications for cancer survivors: By allowing participants to achieve therapeutic levels of exercise, concurrent NMES may be an effective supportive intervention in cancer rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of Smartphone-Based Exercise Training Integrated with Functional Electrical Stimulation After Stroke (SETS): A Preliminary Study.

Purohit R, Appelgren-Gonzalez J, Varas-Diaz G, Wang S, Hosiasson M, Covarrubias-Escudero F Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006483 PMC: 11861842. DOI: 10.3390/s25041254.


Does Exercise Affect Cancer via Reverse Cholesterol Transport Process? A Hypothesis Which Needs to Be Clarified by Researchers.

Rahmati S, Taherkhani H, Zarezadehmehrizi A, Moradi L Adv Pharm Bull. 2024; 14(1):9-10.

PMID: 38585459 PMC: 10997941. DOI: 10.34172/apb.2024.008.

References
1.
Campbell K, Winters-Stone K, Wiskemann J, May A, Schwartz A, Courneya K . Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(11):2375-2390. PMC: 8576825. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116. View

2.
Gondin J, Guette M, Ballay Y, Martin A . Electromyostimulation training effects on neural drive and muscle architecture. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(8):1291-9. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000175090.49048.41. View

3.
Courneya K, Karvinen K, Campbell K, Pearcey R, Dundas G, Capstick V . Associations among exercise, body weight, and quality of life in a population-based sample of endometrial cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97(2):422-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.007. View

4.
Jones L, Cohen R, Mabe S, West M, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh J . Assessment of physical functioning in recurrent glioma: preliminary comparison of performance status to functional capacity testing. J Neurooncol. 2009; 94(1):79-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9803-x. View

5.
Maffiuletti N, Roig M, Karatzanos E, Nanas S . Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing skeletal-muscle weakness and wasting in critically ill patients: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2013; 11:137. PMC: 3668245. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-137. View