» Articles » PMID: 29125982

Disability in Activities of Daily Living Among Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29125982
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: People with cancer frequently report limitation in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); essential activities required to live independently within society. Although several studies have assessed ADL related disability, variability in assessment, setting, and population means evidence is difficult to interpret. We aimed to determine the prevalence of ADL related disability, overall and by setting, and the most commonly affected ADLs in people living with cancer.

Methods: We searched twelve databases to June 2016 for observational studies assessing ADL disability in adults with cancer. Data on study design, population, ADL instruments and disability (difficulty with or requiring assistance in ≥1 activity) were extracted, summarised, and pooled to estimate disability prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) overall and by setting.

Results: Forty-three studies comprising 19,246 patients were included. Overall, 36.7% (95% CI 29.8-44.3, 18 studies) and 54.6% (95% CI 46.5-62.3, 15 studies) of patients respectively reported disability relating to basic and instrumental ADLs. Disability was marginally more prevalent in inpatient compared to outpatient settings. The Katz Index (18 studies) and Lawton IADL Scale (11 studies) were the most commonly used instruments. Across the activities studied, the most frequently affected basic ADLs were personal hygiene, walking and transfers, and instrumental ADLs were housework, shopping and transportation.

Conclusions: About one-third and half of adults with cancer respectively have difficulty or require assistance to perform basic and instrumental ADLs. These findings highlight the need for rehabilitation focused on functional independence, and underscore the importance of professionals skilled in occupational assessment and therapy within cancer services.

Citing Articles

An App-Based Intervention With Behavioral Support to Promote Brisk Walking in People Diagnosed With Breast, Prostate, or Colorectal Cancer (APPROACH): Process Evaluation Study.

Kennedy F, Smith S, Beeken R, Buck C, Williams S, Martin C JMIR Cancer. 2025; 11:e64747.

PMID: 39928926 PMC: 11851027. DOI: 10.2196/64747.


Impact of Bone-Modifying Agents on Post-Bone Metastasis Survival Across Cancer Types.

Tamiya H, Nishino K, Kato Y, Nakahashi-Kato R, Kosuga-Tsujimoto Y, Kinoshita S Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(1).

PMID: 39851958 PMC: 11764064. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32010042.


Longitudinal trends and predictors of limitations in activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults: evidence from the KLoSA study.

Oh E, Moon S, Hong G Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1485732.

PMID: 39735760 PMC: 11673221. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1485732.


Embedding rehabilitation into cancer care continuum: an implementation study.

Khan F, Amatya B, Elmalik A, Song K, Diaz D, Dickinson M J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56:jrm40855.

PMID: 39569420 PMC: 11600609. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40855.


Exploring what influences the uptake of cancer rehabilitation services: a realist informed mixed-methods study.

Csontos J, Roche D, Watts T BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e087812.

PMID: 39542462 PMC: 11575298. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087812.