» Articles » PMID: 32811305

Pollen Grain Size Associated with Pollinator Feeding Strategy

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Aug 20
PMID 32811305
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Angiosperm pollen grain diameter varies greatly from a few microns to over 100, but the selective forces driving the interspecific variation in pollen size remain unclear. Although both pre- and post-pollination hypotheses have been proposed, empirical evidence remains scarce. Here we propose that visits by pollen-foraging pollinators have selected against large pollen grains. An association between pollinator behaviour and pollen grain size was confirmed by field studies of 80 flowering species in natural communities, showing that pollinators positively collected pollen in those species with relatively smaller pollen grains but rarely did so in species with larger ones. Allowing for the confounding effects of pollinator type, flower size or style length and pollen grain number, we found a significant effect of pollen-foraging behaviour on variation in pollen grain size, particularly in bee-pollinated plants. While these results suggest that many plant species whose pollen is collected or consumed by pollinators produce small pollen grains, it remains unclear whether pollen grain size is directly affected by pollinator foraging habit or indirectly mediated by pollen number trade-offs.

Citing Articles

Weed Role for Pollinator in the Agroecosystem: Plant-Insect Interactions and Agronomic Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation.

Benvenuti S Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39204685 PMC: 11359367. DOI: 10.3390/plants13162249.


Dispersal capacities of pollen, seeds and spores: insights from comparative analyses of spatial genetic structures in bryophytes and spermatophytes.

Fichant T, Ledent A, Collart F, Vanderpoorten A Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1289240.

PMID: 37965033 PMC: 10642818. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1289240.


Honeybee comb-inspired stiffness gradient-amplified catapult for solid particle repellency.

Zhang W, Jiang W, Zhang C, Qin X, Zheng H, Xu W Nat Nanotechnol. 2023; 19(2):219-225.

PMID: 37845515 DOI: 10.1038/s41565-023-01524-x.


Pollen morphology for successful pollination dependent on pollinator taxa in a generalist plant: relationship with foraging behavior.

Hasegawa T, Itagaki T, Sakai S Oecologia. 2023; 203(1-2):53-62.

PMID: 37787826 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05450-6.


Consequences of whole genome duplication for 2n pollen performance.

Williams J Plant Reprod. 2021; 34(4):321-334.

PMID: 34302535 DOI: 10.1007/s00497-021-00426-z.


References
1.
Ho L, Ane C . A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst Biol. 2014; 63(3):397-408. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu005. View

2.
Minnaar C, Anderson B, de Jager M, Karron J . Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity. Ann Bot. 2018; 123(2):225-245. PMC: 6344347. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy167. View

3.
Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, Posada D . jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(8):772. PMC: 4594756. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. View

4.
Gong Y, Huang S . Floral symmetry: pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1675):4013-20. PMC: 2825790. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1254. View

5.
Cruden R, Miller-Ward S . POLLEN-OVULE RATIO, POLLEN SIZE, AND THE RATIO OF STIGMATIC AREA TO THE POLLEN-BEARING AREA OF THE POLLINATOR: AN HYPOTHESIS. Evolution. 2017; 35(5):964-974. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04962.x. View