» Articles » PMID: 32805196

Carotid Lumen Diameter Is Associated With All-Cause Mortality in the General Population

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 18
PMID 32805196
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Common carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a biomarker for subclinical atherosclerosis and is associated with all-cause as well as cardiovascular mortality. Higher cIMT is accompanied by a compensatory increase in lumen diameter (LD) of the common carotid arteries. Whether cIMT or LD carry more information with regard to mortality is unclear. Methods and Results A total of 2751 subjects (median age 53 years; 52% female) were included. During a median follow-up of 14.9 years (range: 12.8-16.5) a total of 506 subjects died. At baseline, cIMT and LD were assessed by carotid ultrasound scans. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to relate cIMT, LD, LD adjusted for cIMT (LD+cIMT), and LD/cIMT ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality. All models were ranked using Akaike's information criterion. Harrel's c statistic was used to compare the models' predictive power for mortality. A 1-mm increase in LD was related to a higher risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.45, <0.01). This association remained significant when cIMT was added to the model (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.42; <0.01). A 1-mm higher cIMT was also related with greater mortality risk (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.75). The LD/cIMT ratio was not associated with all-cause mortality. LD had the lowest Akaike's information criterion regarding all-cause mortality and improved all-cause mortality prediction compared with the null model (=0.01). CIMT weakened all-cause mortality prediction compared with the LD model. Conclusions LD provided more information for all-cause mortality compared with cIMT in a large population-based sample.

Citing Articles

Design and evaluation of an anthropomorphic neck phantom for improved ultrasound diagnostics of thyroid gland tumors.

Leonov D, Nasibullina A, Grebennikova V, Vlasova O, Bulgakova Y, Belyakova E Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; 19(8):1637-1645.

PMID: 38668928 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03130-1.


Common carotid artery diameter and the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality: a prospective cohort study in northeast China.

Yin Z, Guo J, Li R, Zhou H, Zhang X, Guan S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):251.

PMID: 38254061 PMC: 10801967. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17749-x.


Single time point quantitation of cerebral glucose metabolism by FDG-PET without arterial sampling.

Cumming P, Dias A, Gormsen L, Hansen A, Alberts I, Rominger A EJNMMI Res. 2023; 13(1):104.

PMID: 38032409 PMC: 10689590. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01049-3.


Ideal Life's Simple 7 Score Relates to Macrovascular Structure and Function in the Healthy Population.

Neve G, Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Klenk C, Carrard J Nutrients. 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36079873 PMC: 9460642. DOI: 10.3390/nu14173616.


The Predictive Value of Carotid Ultrasonography With Cardiovascular Risk Factors-A "SPIDER" Promoting Atherosclerosis.

Li H, Xu X, Luo B, Zhang Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:706490.

PMID: 34447790 PMC: 8382941. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.706490.


References
1.
Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M . European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J. 2017; 39(7):508-579. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628. View

2.
Volzke H, Alte D, Schmidt C, Radke D, Lorbeer R, Friedrich N . Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 40(2):294-307. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp394. View

3.
John U, Greiner B, Hensel E, Ludemann J, Piek M, Sauer S . Study of Health In Pomerania (SHIP): a health examination survey in an east German region: objectives and design. Soz Praventivmed. 2001; 46(3):186-94. DOI: 10.1007/BF01324255. View

4.
Lorenz M, Schaefer C, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M . Is carotid intima media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Eur Heart J. 2010; 31(16):2041-8. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq189. View

5.
Harrell Jr F, Lee K, Mark D . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15(4):361-87. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4. View