» Articles » PMID: 32796449

68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG As Imaging Biomarkers of Disease Localisation in Metastatic Neuroblastoma: Implications for Molecular Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Nucl Med Commun
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 16
PMID 32796449
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Iodine-131-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and lutetium-177-labelled DOTATATE (Lu-DOTATATE) are used for molecular radiotherapy of metastatic neuroblastoma. These are taken up by the noradrenaline transporter (NAT) and the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR-2), respectively. Scintigraphy of iodine-123-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and gallium-68 DOTATATE (Ga-DOTATATE) PET are used to select patients for therapy. These demonstrate the extent and location of tumour, and avidity of uptake by cells expressing NAT and SSTR-2, respectively. This study compared the similarities and differences in the anatomical distribution of these two imaging biomarkers in an unselected series of patients with metastatic neuroblastoma undergoing assessment for molecular radiotherapy.

Methods: Paired whole-body planar I-mIBG views and Ga-DOTATATE maximum intensity projection PET scans of metastatic neuroblastoma patients were visually compared. The disease extent was assessed by a semiquantitative scoring method.

Results: Paired scans from 42 patients were reviewed. Ga-DOTATATE scans were positive in all patients, I-mIBG scans were negative in two. In two patients, there was a mismatch, with some lesions identified only on the I-mIBG scan, and others visible only on the Ga-DOTATATE scan.

Conclusion: Ga-DOTATATE and I-mIBG scans yield complementary information. For a more comprehensive assessment, consideration could be given to the use of both I-mIBG and Ga-DOTATATE imaging scans. Because of the heterogeneity of distribution of molecular targets revealed by these techniques, a combination of both I-mIBG and Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy may possibly be more effective than either alone.

Citing Articles

Application of modified Curie and SIOPEN skeleton scoring systems in F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT for neuroblastoma.

Li S, Sang B, Liu J, Liu Y, Xu Y, Sun X Ann Nucl Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39674843 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-02006-3.


Comparison of [F]-OC PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI in the detection and evaluation of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Chen D, Yang S, Chen J, Li T, Liu Y, Zhao X Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(8):2420-2431.

PMID: 36971805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06200-9.


SPECT/CT, PET/CT and PET/MRI: oncologic and infectious applications and protocol considerations.

Voss S Pediatr Radiol. 2023; 53(7):1443-1453.

PMID: 36899268 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05597-7.


The Impact of PET/CT on Paediatric Oncology.

Brink A, Hlongwa K, More S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36673002 PMC: 9857884. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020192.


Imaging of pediatric neuroblastoma: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper.

Lai H, Sharp S, Bhatia A, Dietz K, McCarville B, Rajderkar D Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022; 70 Suppl 4:e29974.

PMID: 36184716 PMC: 10680359. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29974.