» Articles » PMID: 32784203

Exploring International Differences in Ovarian Cancer Treatment: a Comparison of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Patterns of Care

Abstract

Introduction: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership demonstrated international differences in ovarian cancer survival, particularly for women aged 65-74 with advanced disease. These findings suggest differences in treatment could be contributing to survival disparities.

Objective: To compare clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care across seven high-income countries.

Methods: A comparison of guidelines was performed and validated by a clinical working group. To explore clinical practice, a patterns of care survey was developed. A questionnaire regarding management and potential health system-related barriers to providing treatment was emailed to gynecological specialists. Guideline and survey results were crudely compared with 3-year survival by 'distant' stage using Spearman's rho.

Results: Twenty-seven guidelines were compared, and 119 clinicians completed the survey. Guideline-related measures varied between countries but did not correlate with survival internationally. Guidelines were consistent for surgical recommendations of either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Reported patterns of surgical care varied internationally, including for rates of primary versus interval debulking, extensive/'ultra-radical' surgery, and perceived barriers to optimal cytoreduction. Comparison showed that willingness to undertake extensive surgery correlated with survival across countries (r=0.94, p=0.017). For systemic/radiation therapies, guideline differences were more pronounced, particularly for bevacizumab and PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors. Reported health system-related barriers also varied internationally and included a lack of adequate hospital staffing and treatment monitoring via local and national audits.

Discussion: Findings suggest international variations in ovarian cancer treatment. Characteristics relating to countries with higher stage-specific survival included higher reported rates of primary surgery; willingness to undertake extensive/ultra-radical procedures; greater access to high-cost drugs; and auditing.

Citing Articles

'I was eager to do anything I could to improve the situation': a qualitative study of patients' experiences and views of prehabilitation for ovarian cancer surgery.

Saggu R, Shaw C, Hughes C, Lagergren P, Butler J, McGregor A BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):121.

PMID: 40089781 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03630-5.


Infrastructural and public health awareness gaps for the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer: A literature review.

Papalois K, Fotopoulou C Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 309(5):1807-1813.

PMID: 38413425 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07371-y.


Impact of Ovarian Cancer Surgery Volume on Overall and Progression-Free Survival: A Population-Based Retrospective National French Study.

Prost P, Duraes M, Georgescu V, Rebel L, Mercier G, Rathat G Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(5):3269-3279.

PMID: 38393461 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15050-0.


Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer care: a survey report on global patterns of care, current practices, and barriers.

Algera M, Morton R, Sundar S, Farrell R, van Driel W, Brennan D Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023; 33(10):1612-1620.

PMID: 37591611 PMC: 10579489. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004563.


Management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a European survey.

Jochum F, Angeles M, Balaya V, Drouin L, Nikolova T, Mathevet P Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 308(2):535-549.

PMID: 36737552 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-06948-3.


References
1.
Maringe C, Walters S, Butler J, Coleman M, Hacker N, Hanna L . Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033. View

2.
Crawford-Williams F, Goodwin B, March S, Ireland M, Hyde M, Chambers S . Cancer care in regional Australia from the health professional's perspective. Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26(10):3507-3515. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4218-x. View

3.
Querleu D, Planchamp F, Chiva L, Fotopoulou C, Barton D, Cibula D . European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology Quality Indicators for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26(7):1354-63. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000767. View

4.
Park S, Kim J, Kim S, Lee E, Oh S, Seol A . Practice patterns of surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: analysis from international surveys. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018; 49(2):137-145. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy175. View

5.
Arnold M, Rutherford M, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Andersson T, Myklebust T . Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(11):1493-1505. PMC: 6838671. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5. View