» Articles » PMID: 32781460

Dissecting Diagnostic Heterogeneity in Depression by Integrating Neuroimaging and Genetics

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 12
PMID 32781460
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Depression is a heterogeneous and etiologically complex psychiatric syndrome, not a unitary disease entity, encompassing a broad spectrum of psychopathology arising from distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Motivated by a need to advance our understanding of these mechanisms and develop new treatment strategies, there is a renewed interest in investigating the neurobiological basis of heterogeneity in depression and rethinking our approach to diagnosis for research purposes. Large-scale genome-wide association studies have now identified multiple genetic risk variants implicating excitatory neurotransmission and synapse function and underscoring a highly polygenic inheritance pattern that may be another important contributor to heterogeneity in depression. Here, we review various sources of phenotypic heterogeneity and approaches to defining and studying depression subtypes, including symptom-based subtypes and biology-based approaches to decomposing the depression syndrome. We review "dimensional," "categorical," and "hybrid" approaches to parsing phenotypic heterogeneity in depression and defining subtypes using functional neuroimaging. Next, we review recent progress in neuroimaging genetics (correlating neuroimaging patterns of brain function with genetic data) and its potential utility for generating testable hypotheses concerning molecular and circuit-level mechanisms. We discuss how genetic variants and transcriptomic profiles may confer risk for depression by modulating brain structure and function. We conclude by highlighting several promising areas for future research into the neurobiological underpinnings of heterogeneity, including efforts to understand sexually dimorphic mechanisms, the longitudinal dynamics of depressive episodes, and strategies for developing personalized treatments and facilitating clinical decision-making.

Citing Articles

Increased individual variability in functional connectivity of the default mode network and its genetic correlates in major depressive disorder.

Yao C, Wang P, Xiao Y, Zheng Y, Pu J, Miao Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8853.

PMID: 40087380 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92849-1.


Dissecting biological heterogeneity in major depressive disorder based on neuroimaging subtypes with multi-omics data.

Tang L, Tang R, Zheng J, Zhao P, Zhu R, Tang Y Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):72.

PMID: 40032862 PMC: 11876359. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03286-7.


Lack of association between pretreatment glutamate/GABA and major depressive disorder treatment response.

Dai F, Wengler K, He X, Wang J, Yang J, Parsey R Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):71.

PMID: 40025010 PMC: 11873289. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03292-9.


Baseline Functional Connectivity of the Mesolimbic, Salience, and Sensorimotor Systems Predicts Responses to Psychological Therapies for Chronic Low Back Pain With Comorbid Depression: A Functional MRI Study.

Medina S, Forero C, Sanabria-Mazo J, Rodriguez-Freire C, Navarrete J, ODaly O Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70380.

PMID: 40022281 PMC: 11870833. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70380.


Physical Activity and Depression in Breast Cancer Patients: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.

Li A, Zheng X, Liu D, Huang R, Ge H, Cheng L Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(2).

PMID: 39996878 PMC: 11854877. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32020077.