A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab With or Without Radiation in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) ± radiation therapy (RT) in a phase 2 study among patients with progressive, metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).
Methods And Materials: Eligible patients had metastatic ACC with progression within the last year and ≥1 measurable lesion. Patients were randomized to pembro alone or with RT to 30 Gy in 5 fractions (pembroRT). The primary endpoint was objective response rate outside the RT field. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local RT responses.
Results: We randomized 20 patients (10 per arm) from 2017 to 2018. We did not observe objective response outside of the radiation treatment field; stable disease (SD) was the best response in 12 (60%) patients and was not different per arm (7 pembro, 5 pembroRT, P = .65). A tumor growth rate decrease (TGR) of >25% was noted among 7 of 12 patients and >75% in 4 patients. There were local responses in the irradiated field among all evaluable pembroRT patients. Median PFS and OS were 4.5/not reached for pembroRT and 6.6 / 27.2 months for pembro patients. One patient developed grade 3 liver enzyme elevation after 27 cycles of therapy. Correlative analyses confirm low levels of programmed death-ligand 1 expression (PD-L1), and CD8 infiltrating T-cells. We identified associations between local response and both MYB/NFIB translocation and PD-L1 expression and between changes in systemic immune populations and RT.
Conclusions: Pembrolizumab and pembroRT were well tolerated. We observed no objective responses, but 60% of patients with PD before the study achieved SD, the majority with decreased TGR and half (n = 10) with clinical benefit (SD >6 months). We observed favorable local responses within the RT field. Additional strategies are needed to further delay progression and effect response.
Salivary Gland Cancers in the Era of Molecular Analysis: The Role of Tissue and Liquid Biomarkers.
Broseghini E, Carosi F, Berti M, Compagno S, Ghelardini A, Fermi M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).
PMID: 40002255 PMC: 11852825. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040660.
Li J, Zhou X, Wu L, Ma J, Tan Y, Wu S BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):293.
PMID: 39966752 PMC: 11837729. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13712-0.
Eigentler T, Thomas I, Samoylenko I, Erdmann M, Heinzerling L, Ochsenreither S J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(2).
PMID: 39904560 PMC: 11795518. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009352.
Stawarz K, Durzynska M, Galazka A, Gorzelnik A, Zwolinski J, Paszkowska M Oncol Lett. 2025; 29(3):153.
PMID: 39898287 PMC: 11782928. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2025.14899.
NISCAHN: a phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with salivary gland carcinoma (Unicancer ORL-08).
Fayette J, Even C, Digue L, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Cupissol D BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000065.
PMID: 39886516 PMC: 11235021. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000065.