» Articles » PMID: 32779233

Informed Consent for Controlled Human Infection Studies in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Ethical Challenges and Proposed Solutions

Overview
Journal Bioethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2020 Aug 12
PMID 32779233
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In controlled human infection studies (CHIs), participants are deliberately exposed to infectious agents in order to better understand the mechanism of infection or disease and test therapies or vaccines. While most CHIs have been conducted in high-income countries, CHIs have recently been expanding into low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One potential ethical concern about this expansion is the challenge of obtaining the voluntary informed consent of participants, especially those who may not be literate or have limited education. In some CHIs in LMICs, researchers have attempted to address this potential concern by limiting access to literate or educated populations. In this paper, we argue that this practice is unjustified, as it does not increase the chances of obtaining valid informed consent and therefore unfairly excludes illiterate populations and populations with lower education. Instead, we recommend that investigators improve the informed consent process by drawing on existing data on obtaining informed consent in these populations and interventions aimed at improving their understanding. Based on a literature review, we provide concrete suggestions for how to follow this recommendation and ensure that populations with lower literacy or education are given a fair opportunity to protect their rights and interests in the informed consent process.

Citing Articles

Ethical considerations for research involving pregnant women living with HIV and their young children: a systematic review of the empiric literature and discussion.

Raciti C, Enane L, MacDonald K, Whipple E, Ott M, McHenry M BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1):38.

PMID: 33794891 PMC: 8017748. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00601-x.

References
1.
Afolabi M, Bojang K, DAlessandro U, Ota M, Imoukhuede E, Ravinetto R . Digitised audio questionnaire for assessment of informed consent comprehension in a low-literacy African research population: development and psychometric evaluation. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(6):e004817. PMC: 4078776. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004817. View

2.
Minnies D, Hawkridge T, Hanekom W, Ehrlich R, London L, Hussey G . Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country setting. BMC Med Ethics. 2008; 9:15. PMC: 2575196. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-15. View

3.
Aguila E, Weidmer B, Illingworth A, Martinez H . Culturally Competent Informed-Consent Process to Evaluate a Social Policy for Older Persons With Low Literacy: The Mexican Case. Sage Open. 2017; 6(3). PMC: 5562373. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016665886. View

4.
Jamrozik E, Selgelid M . Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy. J Med Ethics. 2020; 46(9):601-609. PMC: 7476299. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-106001. View

5.
Ndebele P, Wassenaar D, Munalula E, Masiye F . Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi. BMC Med Ethics. 2012; 13:29. PMC: 3507846. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-29. View