Digitised Audio Questionnaire for Assessment of Informed Consent Comprehension in a Low-literacy African Research Population: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2014 Jun 26

PMID 24961716

Citations 13

Authors

Muhammed O Afolabi

Kalifa Bojang

Umberto DAlessandro

Martin O C Ota

Egeruan B Imoukhuede

Raffaella Ravinetto

Heidi J Larson

Nuala McGrath

Daniel Chandramohan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate an audio digitised tool for assessment of comprehension of informed consent among low-literacy Gambian research participants.

Setting: We conducted this study in the Gambia where a high illiteracy rate and absence of standardised writing formats of local languages pose major challenges for research participants to comprehend consent information. We developed a 34-item questionnaire to assess participants' comprehension of key elements of informed consent. The questionnaire was face validated and content validated by experienced researchers. To bypass the challenge of a lack of standardised writing formats, we audiorecorded the questionnaire in three major Gambian languages: Mandinka, Wolof and Fula. The questionnaire was further developed into an audio computer-assisted interview format.

Participants: The digitised questionnaire was administered to 250 participants enrolled in two clinical trials in the urban and rural areas of the Gambia. One week after first administration, the questionnaire was readministered to half of the participants who were randomly selected. Participants were eligible if enrolled in the parent trials and could speak any of the three major Gambian languages.

Outcome Measure: The primary outcome measure was reliability and validity of the questionnaire.

Results: Item reduction by factor analysis showed that 21 of the question items have strong factor loadings. These were retained along with five other items which were fundamental components of informed consent. The 26-item questionnaire has high internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.73-0.79 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% CI 0.923 to 0.954). Hypotheses testing also showed that the questionnaire has a positive correlation with a similar questionnaire and discriminates between participants with and without education.

Conclusions: We have developed a reliable and valid measure of comprehension of informed consent information for the Gambian context, which might be easily adapted to similar settings. This is a major step towards engendering comprehension of informed consent information among low-literacy participants.

Citing Articles

Acceptability of the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine alongside existing malaria interventions in the trial context.

Diawara H, Grant J, Dicko A, Traore S, Issiaka D, Koita F BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39900425 PMC: 11795384. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015524.

Acceptability and effectiveness of a study information video in improving the research consent process for youth: a non-inferiority trial.

Mwaturura T, Simms V, Dauya E, Shrestha S, Ferrand S, Shavani T BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39828429 PMC: 11749567. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014481.

Assessment of Consent Comprehension Among Kenyan Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents: Comparison of Enhanced and Standard Consenting Procedures.

Luseno W, Iritani B, Hartman S, Odongo F, Otieno F, Ongili B J Adolesc Health. 2023; 74(3):605-612.

PMID: 38069940 PMC: 10873115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.10.009.

Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.

Cohen E, Byrom B, Becher A, Jornten-Karlsson M, Mackenzie A J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e43883.

PMID: 37656499 PMC: 10504628. DOI: 10.2196/43883.

Beyond translations, perspectives for researchers to consider to enhance comprehension during consent processes for health research in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Busisiwe N, Seeley J, Strode A, Parker M BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):43.

PMID: 37344810 PMC: 10286482. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00920-1.

References

Minnies D, Hawkridge T, Hanekom W, Ehrlich R, London L, Hussey G . Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country setting. BMC Med Ethics. 2008; 9:15. PMC: 2575196. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-15. View

Joffe S, Cook E, Cleary P, Clark J, Weeks J . Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93(2):139-47. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.2.139. View

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

Flory J, Emanuel E . Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004; 292(13):1593-601. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593. View

DeVon H, Block M, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst D, Hayden S, Lazzara D . A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007; 39(2):155-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x. View

Miller C, ODONNELL D, Searight H, Barbarash R . The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 1996; 16(5):872-8. View

Penn C, Evans M . Assessing the impact of a modified informed consent process in a South African HIV/AIDS research trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 80(2):191-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.019. View

Angell M . The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(12):847-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371209. View

Fitzgerald D, Marotte C, Verdier R, Johnson Jr W, Pape J . Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. Lancet. 2002; 360(9342):1301-2. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11338-9. View

10.

. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Bull Med Ethics. 2004; (182):17-23. View

11.

Woodsong C, Abdool Karim Q . A model designed to enhance informed consent: experiences from the HIV prevention trials network. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(3):412-9. PMC: 1449193. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.041624. View

12.

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

13.

Preziosi M, Yam A, Ndiaye M, Simaga A, Simondon F, Wassilak S . Practical experiences in obtaining informed consent for a vaccine trial in rural Africa. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336(5):370-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199701303360511. View

14.

Afolabi M, Adetifa J, Imoukhuede E, Viebig N, Kampmann B, Bojang K . Early phase clinical trials with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and malaria vectored vaccines in The Gambia: frontline challenges in study design and implementation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014; 90(5):908-14. PMC: 4015586. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0615. View

15.

Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin P, Tilburt J, Murad M, McCormick J . Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:28. PMC: 3733934. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28. View

16.

Marsh V, Kamuya D, Mlamba A, Williams T, Molyneux S . Experiences with community engagement and informed consent in a genetic cohort study of severe childhood diseases in Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2010; 11:13. PMC: 2918624. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-13. View

17.

Molyneux C, Peshu N, Marsh K . Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(12):2547-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.037. View

18.

Guarino P, Lamping D, Elbourne D, Carpenter J, Peduzzi P . A brief measure of perceived understanding of informed consent in a clinical trial was validated. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(6):608-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.009. View

19.

Sugarman J, Lavori P, Boeger M, Cain C, Edsond R, Morrison V . Evaluating the quality of informed consent. Clin Trials. 2005; 2(1):34-41. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn066oa. View

20.

Afolabi M, Bojang K, DAlessandro U, Imoukhuede E, Ravinetto R, Larson H . Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014; 5(3):178. PMC: 4133653. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000178. View